aop
ad

Institutes rejected CIMA's plea to renegotiate costs

by Kevin Reed

More from this author

04 Mar 2011

CIMA logo

INSTITUTES REJECTED CIMA's request to bring in an arbitrator to renegotiate the costs of funding the forum of professional bodies.

After quitting the Consultative Committee of Accounting Bodies (CCAB), CIMA explained that its members were paying a "hugely disproportionate amount" towards the body. However, CIMA's request to renegotiate the fee structure through an arbitrator was turned down by the other institutes: the ICAEW; ACCA; ICAS; ICAI; and CIPFA.

"We were unable to convince our CCAB colleagues of this," said Robin Vaughan, CIMA executive director, governance and professional standards.

"We couldn't discuss this forever, so we brought a close to the argument."

Under a seven-year agreement, the institutes had set a tariff to provide funds to the CCAB and accounting regulator the Financial Reporting Council.

The agreement allowed for a revisit of the structure two years ago, which CIMA requested. CIMA argued that the audit focus of both the CCAB and the FRC left the institute with a disproportionate bill, based on its focus on finance professionals in business. It paid out £1.5m in fees to accounting regulators from a total of £2.8m on professional standards, according to its 2009 accounts.

"[That was an] extraordinarily disappointing end to the journey, that we didn't want to reach," said Vaughan. "The CCAB is excellent, but had diminishing value for us."

CIMA has ended its payments to the CCAB, but is still making payouts to the FRC. CIMA has asked the FRC to set the wheels in motion for a statutory framework under which all institutes' payments to the body are set.

"We're very confident our case is a good one, but we're not in the business of saying 'we're not going to pay up'," Vaughan added.

CIMA's influence through European accounting regulatory bodies will be undiminished despite quitting the CCAB, said Vaughan. Instead, CIMA will be more "more energetic and distinctive" in being able to represent its views.

To have a voice in the CCAB required agreement from all six bodies - "that drives you to the lowest common denominator", said Vaughan.

"We might have had an energetic point that can't come out, [now] you'll hear our distinctive and authentic voice".

 

Visitor comments Add your comment

subnational vetoes

The Consultative Committee of Accountancy Bodies should represent the views of the UK's profession as one.

"What is preventing the CCAB from being effective?"

http://www.accountancyage.com/aa/news/2030134/cima-quits-diminishing-relevance-uk-professions-forum

Answer: Vetoes. This is similar to impasses at the United Nations Security Council. Each of the five permanent members has a veto (China, France, Russia, UK, US). At the UK's piddling CCAB each of the six has a veto.

Posted by: slightly optimistic, 05 Mar 2011 | 18:33

Add your comment
display:none

Add your comment

We won't publish your address


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms & Conditions

Your comment will be moderated before publication

Submit

Search thousands of financial jobs:

Information currently unavailable.

Search thousands of financial jobs:

Newsletters

Get the latest financial news sent directly to your inbox

  • Best Practice
  • Business
  • Daily Newsletter
  • Essentials

Careers

Search for jobs
Click to search our database of all the latest accountancy roles

Create a profile
Click to set up your profile and let the best recruiters find you

Jobs by email
Sign up to receive regular updates with the latest roles suitable for you

Briefings

Supplier Statement Reconciliations cover

Supplier statement reconciliations: Manual chore or critical value adding process?

By looking at the reasons supplier statements became unfashionable, and the reasons why it is different today, this paper delves into the many benefits that can be obtained by automating the process.

7 Building Blocks cover

7 building blocks for business growth

Having a real and true view of your organisation’s current financial position, and having the right systems and processes in place, will ensure that you can make strong choices and are ready to capitalise on opportunities