FRC competence review leaves watchdog on tenterhooks

FRC competence review leaves watchdog on tenterhooks

The Financial Reporting Council faced serious criticism from shareholders, accountants, and fund managers following the accounting scandals of the last year

The Financial Reporting Council (FRC), watchdog of the UK’s accounting industry, has come under attack after a review which may lead to its demise.

Shareholders, fund managers, and accountants alike have responded negatively to a recent review of the FRC.

The government’s business department conducted the review of the watchdog’s competence earlier in 2018 following a series of scandals that have whipped up uncertainty around it, namely the collapse of Carillion.

John Kingman, Legal and General chairman and former civil servant, is leading the review. The Financial Times conducted analysis into 12 responses to the review and found clear frustration among organisations with regards to the FRC’s actions.

Many organisations wanted either a significant restructuring or a complete abolition of the watchdog.

Two associations which represent individual shareholders put in a joint submission and said: “In practically every financial scandal or crisis, the FRC seems to have taken far too long to decide [on an outcome] and too often has concluded that nothing has gone seriously wrong.”

Key suggestions were that the FRC is less reliant on alumni from Big Four firms and that it hires representatives from employers’ organisations like the Trades Union Congress.

Some responses were harsher still. The Association of Accounting Technicians (AAT) said the FRC had “presided over a catalogue of audit failure that has brought its own existence into question”.

The Investment Association, representative of fund managers collectively, said: “Culturally, the organisation is seen as being reactive, too slow when undertaking investigative or enforcement action, fails to take investor feedback into account, and narrowly focused on processes rather than outcomes with staff who have a homogenous skillset.”

Other respondents think a new “super regulator” should be introduced which merges parts of the current FRC together with the Companies House and Insolvency Service.

There was also the suggestion that the FRC’s successor is given greater resources and the ability to hold all directors to account. At the moment they only have the power to punish directors who are qualified accountants.

An FRC spokesman said the regulator looks forward “to seeing Sir John’s final recommendations when he publishes them later this year”.

Related Articles

Audit sector under immediate review by CMA

Audit Audit sector under immediate review by CMA

7d Emanuela Hawker, Reporter
FRC shout for independence, viability and higher quality in the UK audit market

Audit FRC shout for independence, viability and higher quality in the UK audit market

1w Lucy Skoulding, Reporter
Fined by FRC: Grant Thornton next in the firing line

Audit Fined by FRC: Grant Thornton next in the firing line

1m Emanuela Hawker, Reporter
KPMG fined and reprimanded over Ted Baker audits

Audit KPMG fined and reprimanded over Ted Baker audits

2m Lucy Skoulding, Reporter
The global fight against fraud and corruption: what role does the accountant play?

Audit The global fight against fraud and corruption: what role does the accountant play?

2m Lucy Skoulding, Reporter
FRC strikes out at PwC's BHS audit quality following leaked report

Audit FRC strikes out at PwC's BHS audit quality following leaked report

2m Lucy Skoulding, Reporter
Monthly news roundup with Lucy Skoulding

Audit Monthly news roundup with Lucy Skoulding

2m Lucy Skoulding, Reporter
FRC data on Big Four audits may highlight need for industry overhaul

Audit FRC data on Big Four audits may highlight need for industry overhaul

2m Lucy Skoulding, Reporter