PracticeAuditBrexit raises questions about future of the FRC’s regulatory framework

Brexit raises questions about future of the FRC's regulatory framework

The UK’s decision to leave the EU has raised questions about whether the FRC's regulatory framework should change in the future

THE FRC has revealed a “step change” in its responsibilities as the profession’s watchdog and suggested the outcome of the referendum on the UK’s membership of the EU has raised questions about the regulator’s future.

In its annual report for 2015/16, the FRC said it will focus on its new role as the competent authority for audit in the UK to improve audit quality and strengthen investor confidence.

Sir Win Bischoff, chairman of the FRC, said accounting watchdog’s aim, after being handed extended powers under the new rules on audit regulation across the EU, is that by the end of 2019 at least 90% of FTSE 350 audits will require no more than limited improvements.

The FRC added that although the UK’s decision to leave the EU has not changed its regulatory framework, it has raised questions about whether it should change in the future.

“We will consequentially pay close attention to the decision now taken by government and parliament, and continue to work in collaboration with our key stakeholders, particularly investors, business and the professionals we regulate, in order to ensure our work continues to support economic growth and the effective functioning of the capital markets,” Bischoff said.

In 2016/17 the FRC said it will undertake the following actions:

  • Make the best use of our role as Competent Authority for Audit regulation to drive further improvements in audit quality and strengthen investor confidence.
  • Promote the importance of establishing a company specific corporate culture to support long-term sustainable growth.
  • Encourage better reporting against the Stewardship Code by assessing the quality of signatory statements.
  • Assess the quality of viability reporting in the light of the 2014 UK Corporate Governance Code.
  • Continue to promote Clear & Concise reporting, including through the project to help smaller listed and AIM companies with the quality of their reporting.

Bischoff added: “I have taken a personal interest in our ‘culture coalition’ project. In my experience, embedding a healthy corporate culture, with a focus on respect and good behaviour, is vital to the success of any business and creates an environment on which investors can depend. We have brought together a number of organisations to gather insight into corporate culture and the role of boards, to understand how boards can shape, embed and assess culture, and to identify and promote good practice.”

Related Articles

Auditors ‘in the dock’ over Carillion as report calls for Big Four break-up

Audit Auditors ‘in the dock’ over Carillion as report calls for Big Four break-up

5d Emma Smith, Managing Editor
KPMG South Africa to review past audit work amid fresh scandal

Audit KPMG South Africa to review past audit work amid fresh scandal

1m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
FRC introduces £10m sanctions for Big Four firms

Audit FRC introduces £10m sanctions for Big Four firms

1m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
Ukraine’s PrivatBank files $3bn claim against PwC

Audit Ukraine’s PrivatBank files $3bn claim against PwC

2m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
Grant Thornton to exit FTSE 350 audit market, citing Big Four dominance

Audit Grant Thornton to exit FTSE 350 audit market, citing Big Four dominance

2m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
Big Four dominate FTSE 250 audit market in Q1 rankings

Audit Big Four dominate FTSE 250 audit market in Q1 rankings

3m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
Deloitte to pay $149.5m over Taylor, Bean & Whitaker audit failure

Audit Deloitte to pay $149.5m over Taylor, Bean & Whitaker audit failure

3m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
Carillion inquiry: missed red flags, aggressive accounting and the pension deficit

Audit Carillion inquiry: missed red flags, aggressive accounting and the pension deficit

3m Alia Shoaib, Reporter