aop
ad

Will SEIS unfreeze investment?

by Kevin Reed

More from this author

30 Nov 2011

george-osborne-chancellor

ADVISERS HAVE welcomed the freeing up of tax rules for investment in start-ups, but have questioned whether the chancellor's plans have gone far enough.

The Seed Enterprise Investment Scheme (SEIS) was launched by George Osborne in yesterday's Autumn Statement. SEIS will enable individuals who invest up to £100,000 in a new business to claim 50% tax relief on their investment, regardless of their tax rate.

For 2012/2013, where a capital gain is realised and invested under this scheme in the same tax year, the gain will be exempt from tax.

Some advisors are concerned that the £100,000 limit is too small, effectively restricting an investor to one or two investments a year.

"We'd like to see the limit increased to at least £300,000 to maximise the number of start-up business that can benefit," said Stephen Bayfield, PKF corporate finance partner.

Alongside SEIS, Osborne announced easing previous restrictions on R&D tax credits, extensions to business rate relief holidays and government underwriting of small business loans through the National Loan Guarantee Scheme. Rules restricting ‘friends and family' gaining tax relief under the Enterprise Investment Scheme was also lifted.

As a whole, Berg Kaprow Lewis tax partner David Whiscombe welcomed the government's direction on helping micro businesses and SMEs. "The combination might just be what is needed to kick-start private investment into new micro-businesses.

Others were unsure that the proposals went far enough."The question with both of these is how much of an effect will they have. The SEIS measures are very generous but also relatively small, while for businesses the 1% reduction in borrowing costs offered by credit easing may not solve every problem - the availability of borrowing at all and the lack of demand in the economy are likely to weigh more heavily," said PwC partner Alex Henderson.

Visitor comments Add your comment

Length of a piece of string ?????

How far do you want to go to interfere in & distort the free market?

Where is the money coming from, given that our standard of living will fall for the next 12 years.

Perhaps if child benefits were eliminated for the first child, restricted to the second child, reduced for the third child & eliminated thereafter, certain sectors of the country would not be breeding children unfit & unequipped for jobs which do not exist.

Thus we would have a circular solution to the problem facing the UK today - eliminating inappropriate public borrowing.

Posted by: Criss Roger, 30 Nov 2011 | 15:21

Add your comment
display:none

Add your comment

We won't publish your address


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms & Conditions

Your comment will be moderated before publication

Submit

Search thousands of financial jobs:

Information currently unavailable.

Search thousands of financial jobs:

Newsletters

Get the latest financial news sent directly to your inbox

  • Best Practice
  • Business
  • Daily Newsletter
  • Essentials

Careers

Search for jobs
Click to search our database of all the latest accountancy roles

Create a profile
Click to set up your profile and let the best recruiters find you

Jobs by email
Sign up to receive regular updates with the latest roles suitable for you

Briefings

Supplier Statement Reconciliations cover

Supplier statement reconciliations: Manual chore or critical value adding process?

By looking at the reasons supplier statements became unfashionable, and the reasons why it is different today, this paper delves into the many benefits that can be obtained by automating the process.

7 Building Blocks cover

7 building blocks for business growth

Having a real and true view of your organisation’s current financial position, and having the right systems and processes in place, will ensure that you can make strong choices and are ready to capitalise on opportunities