aop
ad

Tax defaulters could take HMRC to court

by Rachael Singh

More from this author

22 Mar 2011

HMRC tax fraud investigations

TAX EVADERS could launch human right court battles against HM Revenue & Customs for keeping them under scrutiny, warns City law firm Reynolds Porter Chamberlain (RPC).

As part of HMRC's Managing Deliberate Defaulters programme, the taxman will track individuals that have evaded tax in the last five years.

However, RPC claims this could provoke legal proceedings as the scrutiny could infringe on rights to "privacy" or "peaceful enjoyment of their property".

Jonathan Levy, head of tax disputes at RPC, said: "HMRC are obliged to comply with the Human Rights Act and the European Convention of Human Rights. Taking such a proactive and targeted approach may, in certain circumstances, infringe taxpayers' human rights."

"Whilst no one should condone deliberate tax evasion, the police do not target ‘known' criminals in such a way, so it is surprising that the tax authorities have decided to adopt such an approach."

The new measures include unannounced inspection visits, record checks, requests for extra information and inspecting the records of an organisation's customers.

Levy explains some of the targeted individuals may not be "deliberate defaulters". They may be in disagreement with HMRC over the structue they use to avoid tax.

The strategy appears to have been decided by HMRC without parliamentary approval, he added.

HMRC has already begun monitoring 900 individuals as part of the programme.

Visitor comments Add your comment

Human Rights - least of their worries

HMRC records are SO DIRE at the moment, chances are they would go to court for the wrong people and amounts.

Their back office staff can put a "flag" on an account which has NO audit trail (date, originator, reason, proof that taxpayer has even been contacted) and the baliffs are called in.

The front office (call centre) cannot remove this flag, but CAN admit that it's hogwash.

Court cases - bring it on. HMRC will become an utter laughing stock before we get anywhere near the Human Rights act.

Posted by: Eleanor, 22 Mar 2011 | 17:21

Who are we protecting ?

Innocent people have nothing to fear. Its about time the HRA was over hauled and thrown out. Too often the act appears to be used by the guilty along with a host of other Acts as a 'get out of jail' card.

Posted by: ashley smith, 23 Mar 2011 | 12:08

Add your comment
display:none

Add your comment

We won't publish your address


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms & Conditions

Your comment will be moderated before publication

Submit

Search thousands of financial jobs:

Information currently unavailable.

Search thousands of financial jobs:

Newsletters

Get the latest financial news sent directly to your inbox

  • Best Practice
  • Business
  • Daily Newsletter
  • Essentials

Careers

Search for jobs
Click to search our database of all the latest accountancy roles

Create a profile
Click to set up your profile and let the best recruiters find you

Jobs by email
Sign up to receive regular updates with the latest roles suitable for you

Briefings

Supplier Statement Reconciliations cover

Supplier statement reconciliations: Manual chore or critical value adding process?

By looking at the reasons supplier statements became unfashionable, and the reasons why it is different today, this paper delves into the many benefits that can be obtained by automating the process.

7 Building Blocks cover

7 building blocks for business growth

Having a real and true view of your organisation’s current financial position, and having the right systems and processes in place, will ensure that you can make strong choices and are ready to capitalise on opportunities