CCAB six patch up differences

by Damian wild

07 Jul 2005

  • Comments

The six main UK institutes have pledged to work together, after a fractious period that has seen relations between some of the key bodies threaten to break down completely.

At the last meeting of the six presidents, ACCA’s Christopher Forster sought and won commitment from his counterparts to use the Consultative Committee of Accountancy Bodies to pursue a common agenda.

The agreement comes after the ICAEW said it would reconsider its collaboration with ICAS through the CCAB, in light of comments made by the Scots’ chief executive Des Hudson. Writing in Accountancy Age last month, Hudson said the planned merger of ICAEW and CIPFA was based on ‘unproven beliefs’.

ICAEW chief executive Eric Anstee responded angrily, saying he may look to ‘realign’ the institute’s funding of the CCAB. ‘If ICAS wants to have an equal voice, it must have an equal share of the budget,’ he said.

Accountancy Age understands that CCAB relations have been further strained in recent months by disputes over who should represent the body on the International Federation of Accountants council and on the Financial Reporting Council. The FRC wants to move away from a traditional ‘rotating’ seat on its main council.

Both posts are traditionally held by the ICAEW president. But other CCAB bodies are beginning to lobby for an end to automatic ICAEW representation.

Anstee acts as secretary to what is a limited company with the six presidents of the main UK accountancy institutes serving as directors.

As well as being a member of the company, the ICAEW is contracted to provide administrative and secretarial services and each of the institutes contributes to its £1.45m annual running costs – roughly in proportion to the number of shares owned.

The ICAEW owns 52% of the shares, ACCA owns 17%, CIMA owns 15%, CIPFA 6%, ICAS 7% and the ICAI 3%. ICAEW president Ian Morris, who chaired last week’s meeting, said he was impressed by the ‘openness of the debate’ and the ‘willingness to work together’.

Visitor comments

blog comments powered by Disqus
display:none

Add your comment

We won't publish your address


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms & Conditions

Your comment will be moderated before publication

Submit
  • Send

Appointments to University Committees

University of Glasgow 120x60University of Glasgow - Glasgow - unremunerated positions

 

 

Newsletters

Get the latest financial news sent directly to your inbox

  • Best Practice
  • Business
  • Daily Newsletter
  • Essentials

Careers

Search for jobs
Click to search our database of all the latest accountancy roles

Create a profile
Click to set up your profile and let the best recruiters find you

Jobs by email
Sign up to receive regular updates with the latest roles suitable for you

Briefings

budget-management

Why budgeting fails: One management system is not enough

If budgeting is to have any value at all, it needs a radical overhaul. In today's dynamic marketplace, budgeting can no longer serve as a company's only management system; it must integrate with and support dedicated strategy management systems, process improvement systems, and the like. In this paper, Professor Peter Horvath and Dr Ralf Sauter present what's wrong with the current approach to budgeting and how to fix it.

cchcover

iXBRL: Taking stock. Looking forward

In this white paper CCH provide checklists to help accountants and finance professionals both in practice and in business examine these issues and make plans. Also includes a case study of a large commercial organisation working through the first year of mandatory iXBRL filing.