CCAB six patch up differences

CCAB six patch up differences

Accountancy institutes pledge to work together in the wake of recent squabbles

The six main UK institutes have pledged to work together, after a fractious
period that has seen relations between some of the key bodies threaten to break
down completely.

At the last meeting of the six presidents, ACCA’s Christopher Forster sought
and won commitment from his counterparts to use the Consultative Committee of
Accountancy Bodies to pursue a common agenda.

The agreement comes after the ICAEW said it would reconsider its
collaboration with ICAS through the CCAB, in light of comments made by the
Scots’ chief executive Des Hudson. Writing in Accountancy Age last month, Hudson
said the planned merger of ICAEW and CIPFA was based on ‘unproven beliefs’.

ICAEW chief executive Eric Anstee responded angrily, saying he may look to
‘realign’ the institute’s funding of the CCAB. ‘If ICAS wants to have an equal
voice, it must have an equal share of the budget,’ he said.

Accountancy Age understands that CCAB relations have been further strained in
recent months by disputes over who should represent the body on the
International Federation of Accountants council and on the Financial Reporting
Council. The FRC wants to move away from a traditional ‘rotating’ seat on its
main council.

Both posts are traditionally held by the ICAEW president. But other CCAB
bodies are beginning to lobby for an end to automatic ICAEW representation.

Anstee acts as secretary to what is a limited company with the six presidents
of the main UK accountancy institutes serving as directors.

As well as being a member of the company, the ICAEW is contracted to provide
administrative and secretarial services and each of the institutes contributes
to its £1.45m annual running costs – roughly in proportion to the number of
shares owned.

The ICAEW owns 52% of the shares, ACCA owns 17%, CIMA owns 15%, CIPFA 6%,
ICAS 7% and the ICAI 3%. ICAEW president Ian Morris, who chaired last week’s
meeting, said he was impressed by the ‘openness of the debate’ and the
‘willingness to work together’.

Share

Subscribe to get your daily business insights

Resources & Whitepapers

Why Professional Services Firms Should Ditch Folders and Embrace Metadata
Professional Services

Why Professional Services Firms Should Ditch Folders and Embrace Metadata

3y

Why Professional Services Firms Should Ditch Folde...

In the past decade, the professional services industry has transformed significantly. Digital disruptions, increased competition, and changing market ...

View resource
2 Vital keys to Remaining Competitive for Professional Services Firms

2 Vital keys to Remaining Competitive for Professional Services Firms

3y

2 Vital keys to Remaining Competitive for Professi...

In recent months, professional services firms are facing more pressure than ever to deliver value to clients. Often, clients look at the firms own inf...

View resource
Turn Accounts Payable into a value-engine
Accounting Firms

Turn Accounts Payable into a value-engine

3y

Turn Accounts Payable into a value-engine

In a world of instant results and automated workloads, the potential for AP to drive insights and transform results is enormous. But, if you’re still ...

View resource
Digital Links: A guide to MTD in 2021
Making Tax Digital

Digital Links: A guide to MTD in 2021

3y

Digital Links: A guide to MTD in 2021

The first phase of Making Tax Digital (MTD) saw the requirement for the digital submission of the VAT Return using compliant software. That’s now behi...

View resource