Accounting hubs alleviate standard headache?

by Rose Orlik

More from this author

08 Aug 2011

  • Comments
Computer frustration

THE WORLD of accounting standards increasingly resembles a mush of new and old rules, half converged GAAPs and ongoing revisions.

Global standard setters are straining valiantly towards convergence with the US and in the meantime, their domestic peers are updating local GAAPs and helping companies stranded in the no-man's land between.

What does this mean for international businesses? How do the HSBCs and the BPs of this world reconcile accounts from far-flung jurisdictions without getting in a mess - or a huge bill?

One answer could be accounting hubs. Proponents say these one-stop-standard-shops suck in numbers from transactions around the world and spit out perfectly reconciled accounts that are comparable, transparent and standard-compliant.

They work by divorcing the processing of data from the generation of the accounting event, meaning users can control their financial reporting precisely and, in theory, turn out perfect audit trails.

And some banks may already be using them, unbeknown to customers who like to think financial institutions are perfectly equipped to crunch their own numbers, thank you very much.

One Big Four voice said banks are reluctant to admit they use a hub, for fear of publicly branding their accounts as an unwieldy mess. One notable exception is Swiss Re, which began using the Microgen offering last year. Other banks could also be interested, as once in place they might make financial reporting faster, cheaper and a whole lot less painful.

It's installing them that could be putting off would-be users right now. Banks were early IT adopters and consequently, have a long legacy of programmes, systems, half-remembered rules and re-imagined processes, all of which would have to be reconciled for an accounting hub to work.

Inputting one product system on to a hub should take between one and two months, meaning transferring the accounts of an international entity could be incredibly time consuming. The first step would be analysis of existing systems, and extensive risk-testing would be essential before launch.

Of course, to enjoy maximum benefits companies would have to run multiple systems through the hub, extending the time and cost involved in transfer. The pay-off, supporters say, would be a much higher level of control over group and individual accounts.

Once businesses have made this leap, producing financial reports might be a doddle. Changes to accounting standards could be incorporated into the hub, making IASB deliberations a less worrisome prospect, and the process should be much less staff- and cash-heavy.

Providers such as Microgen, Oracle and SAP are clamouring for converts to the accounting hub. One expert said for any significant shift towards widespread use, regulations would have to change.

If the regulatory framework tightens, potentially requiring companies to rapidly churn our transparent, comparable accounts, finance directors might turn their thoughts to a hub. The ability to easily demonstrate each step of consolidating every account of an international behemoth is undoubtedly attractive; one commentator said: "If you were starting a new bank you'd undoubtedly put in a hub."

Theoretically useful to banks, are there any other sectors that would benefit? Our Big Four expert wasn't sure of the case for wider business, but conceded insurance companies might see the advantages.

It looks like accounting hubs are an interesting theory, and standard-weary FDs might be tempted by the apparent simplicity they offer. But with the huge challenge of transition, lack of role models and associated stigma, it might be a while before we see users queuing up to tell their accounting hub success stories.

Visitor comments

blog comments powered by Disqus
display:none

Add your comment

We won't publish your address


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms & Conditions

Your comment will be moderated before publication

Submit
  • Send

Financial Planning and Performance AnalystCabinet Office-Greater London-Competitive

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 

Newsletters

Get the latest financial news sent directly to your inbox

  • Best Practice
  • Business
  • Daily Newsletter
  • Essentials

Careers

Search for jobs
Click to search our database of all the latest accountancy roles

Create a profile
Click to set up your profile and let the best recruiters find you

Jobs by email
Sign up to receive regular updates with the latest roles suitable for you

Briefings

budget-management

Why budgeting fails: One management system is not enough

If budgeting is to have any value at all, it needs a radical overhaul. In today's dynamic marketplace, budgeting can no longer serve as a company's only management system; it must integrate with and support dedicated strategy management systems, process improvement systems, and the like. In this paper, Professor Peter Horvath and Dr Ralf Sauter present what's wrong with the current approach to budgeting and how to fix it.

cchcover

iXBRL: Taking stock. Looking forward

In this white paper CCH provide checklists to help accountants and finance professionals both in practice and in business examine these issues and make plans. Also includes a case study of a large commercial organisation working through the first year of mandatory iXBRL filing.