BusinessCompany NewsBehind the numbers: remuneration question

Behind the numbers: remuneration question

I thought I’d start the New Year with a change in style for this column. Rather than pass superficial judgment on other people’s analysis I thought I’d crunch some numbers of my own

And I’ll begin by resolving the tricky question: which Big Four firm is the
best remunerating for partners and for employees? The results, buried in each of
the firm’s 2006 annual reviews, surprised me.

Let’s go in reverse Top 50 order. Ernst &Young’s average profit per
partner was £686,000 up 27% on 2005. Average staff remuneration rose 6% to
£49,101. At KPMG, average partner profits for the year were £556,000, up 14%.
Employee salaries and bonuses rose 1% to £56,647.

Deloitte has, for a long time, been the most lucrative firm in which to hold
a partnership. And this year’s performance was again impressive. Average partner
profits were £785,000, up 8%. Employees saw their remuneration rise to £50,688,
up 5%. At PricewaterhouseCoopers average profit per partner reached £870,000, up
a staggering 42% on 2005. Its £50,482 average salary was up 2.2%.

So Deloitte partners lose their top spot. And as PwC is fond of pointing out,
it is harder for a number one to grow faster, so those rocketing partner profits
are all the more impressive.

Meanwhile salaries at Deloitte, E&Y and PwC are much of a muchness,
KPMG’s staff are way out in front. No wonder the firm has been boasting how it
paid £80m in bonuses to staff in 2006.

Rather than an interesting but insignificant navel gazing exercise all this
struck me as significant on two fronts. One, it mirrors wider economic trends.
Late last year The Work Foundation revealed well-paying managerial and
professional jobs have grown faster than any other sort of work in the UK over
the last decade ­ so you would expect remuneration to rise accordingly.

And let’s not beat around the bush, it also reflects the widening gap between
executive and staff pay elsewhere. A survey by The Guardian and the Reward
Technology Forum last year showed that directors’ pay in the 2005 financial year
rose 28% across the FTSE 100, in contrast to a rise in average earnings of 3.7%,
which means clients are unlikely to object to the firms’ remuneration
strategies.

More than that though all this gives is an answer to that perennial question:
What on earth could persuade the next generation of accountants to take on the
risks and responsibilities of partnership?

Damian Wild is editor in chief of Accountancy Age

Related Articles

BDO replaces Deloitte as Mitie auditor

Audit BDO replaces Deloitte as Mitie auditor

3m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
CVR Global appoints partner in London office

Company News CVR Global appoints partner in London office

7m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
FTSE100 failing to provide adequate ethics information

Company News FTSE100 failing to provide adequate ethics information

7m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
Moore Stephens recruits new private client partner

Accounting Firms Moore Stephens recruits new private client partner

10m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
Magma Group announces merger, partner promotions

Accounting Firms Magma Group announces merger, partner promotions

10m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
BDO on ‘recruitment spree’ with multiple partner appointments

Accounting Firms BDO on ‘recruitment spree’ with multiple partner appointments

10m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
Brand strength leads to fee income growth for RSM

Accounting Firms Brand strength leads to fee income growth for RSM

10m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
Mazars strengthens audit team with partner appointment

Accounting Firms Mazars strengthens audit team with partner appointment

10m Emma Smith, Managing Editor