TaxCorporate TaxHMRC denies multinationals “run rings” around it

HMRC denies multinationals "run rings" around it

Appearing before MPs, HMRC chief executive Dame Lin Homer denies the taxman gets "outmanoeuvred" by the likes of Google

HMRC denies multinationals “run rings” around it

HMRC bosses have defended the taxman’s controversial £130m settlement with Google during as MPs in the influential Public Accounts Committee claimed multinational companies were “running rings” around tax officials.

Appearing before the cross-party committee, HMRC chief executive Dame Lin Homer denied HMRC gets “outmanoeuvred” by the likes of Google. “We make them pay more tax and if I am honest I would like to see more recognition of that,” she told MPs.

Jim Harra, HMRC’s director general business tax, said Google had not been penalised because of the difficulty in proving ‘insufficient care”.

“I do understand the [public] anger, and I think HMRC and the government position is that the current penalty legislation does not work for large companies in the way it should,” Harra told the committee.

Harra was unable to respond to MPs’ questions as to how much the six-year Google tax audit had cost, but said it had been ‘very expensive and resource intensive’, largely because of the complexity in transfer pricing cases.

“We can challenge that and they can accept they need to change their position but it is very difficult to establish they have taken insufficient care,” he said.

Google’s European chief also defended the tech giant’s tax arrangements and the tax deal it struck with HMRC as MPs accused two Google executives of being “out of touch with reality”.

Matt Brittin, head of Google’s European operation, and Google vice-president Tom Hutchinson insisted the Silicon Valley was paying the right amount of tax.

“I understand the anger and understand that people when they see reported that we are paying 3% tax would be angry. But we’re not. We’re paying 20% tax.”

Meg Hillier, chair of the PAC, said Google’s £130m tax settlement with HMRC amounted to a ‘PR disaster’ for the firm and accused Brittin of leaving in a different world to ordinary tax payers when he declined to tell the committee how much he was paid.

“Out there, our constituents are very angry, they live in a different world clearly to the world you live in, if you can’t even tell us what you are paid,” said Hillier.

Related Articles

Big names, little tax: Airbnb, Facebook, Kellogg’s, eBay

Corporate Tax Big names, little tax: Airbnb, Facebook, Kellogg’s, eBay

1m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
EU divided over radical tax reforms targeting tech giants

Corporate Tax EU divided over radical tax reforms targeting tech giants

2m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
How to educate your clients about tax avoidance

Corporate Tax How to educate your clients about tax avoidance

2m Clear Books | Sponsored
HMRC tax evasion assistance requests double in five years

Corporate Tax HMRC tax evasion assistance requests double in five years

4m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
Spring Budget 2017: Making Tax Digital

Business Regulation Spring Budget 2017: Making Tax Digital

8m Shereen Ali, Deputy Editor
CGT clampdown nets HMRC £124m – but could lead to increase in use of avoidance schemes

Corporate Tax CGT clampdown nets HMRC £124m – but could lead to increase in use of avoidance schemes

2m Austin Clark, Reporter
‘Google tax’ nets HMRC £281m

Corporate Tax ‘Google tax’ nets HMRC £281m

2m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
OTS report: Corporation tax should follow accounts

Corporate Tax OTS report: Corporation tax should follow accounts

4m Alia Shoaib, Reporter