OECD ‘embarrassed’ by Google tax

OECD ‘embarrassed’ by Google tax

OECD director admits UK's Google tax may undermine some of the body's BEPS work

GOVERNMENT plans to introduce a diverted profits tax have caused embarrassment at the OECD, according to Pascal Saint-Amans [pictured], the body’s director leading the Base Erosion and Profit-Shifting (BEPS) project.

Appearing via video link before Australia’s Economics References Committee, Saint-Amans said Britain’s decision to implement the 25% levy – popularly dubbed the ‘Google tax’ – could push other countries to take unilateral measures and undermine the project.

Saint-Amans said the OECD had an “embarrassed view” of the levy, which will be applied to multinational businesses that shift profits made in the UK offshore.

“We have sympathy for the need to move and there is an electoral context…on the other hand, unilateral actions are not exactly in the sense of what we are trying to develop, which is, ‘let’s wait for a comprehensive package and then countries will decide’,” he said.

“You will be better informed with better instruments and with a lesser risk of having disruptive actions, which might push other countries… to take unilateral measures, which are not that great when you are negotiating a multilateral package.”

Many advisers believe the threat of the diverted profits tax is notional, with very few multinationals likely to admit they need to self-assess for an issue with the diverted profits tax.

Advisers have warned the levy could by difficult to apply and risks undermining the OECD’s work on profit shifting.

The BEPS project has sought to eliminate the practice of businesses shifting profits into favourable tax jurisdictions, away from where the profits were generated.

 

Whitepaper

The Future of Finance is in the CFO's Hands

Business The Future of Finance is in the CFO's Hands

4m
Save a Week a Month Consolidating Accounts

Accounting Software Save a Week a Month Consolidating Accounts

5m
Mitigating Risk Through Internal Control

Legal Mitigating Risk Through Internal Control

6m
Could tax season have run more efficiently?

Corporate Tax Could tax season have run more efficiently?

6m

Related Articles

Appropriate tax systems – taxation in the ‘Fourth Industrial Revolution’

Corporate Tax Appropriate tax systems – taxation in the ‘Fourth Industrial Revolution’

12m Jane Mackay, Crowe
Big names, little tax: Airbnb, Facebook, Kellogg’s, eBay

Corporate Tax Big names, little tax: Airbnb, Facebook, Kellogg’s, eBay

2y Alia Shoaib, Reporter
EU divided over radical tax reforms targeting tech giants

Corporate Tax EU divided over radical tax reforms targeting tech giants

2y Alia Shoaib, Reporter
How to educate your clients about tax avoidance

Corporate Tax How to educate your clients about tax avoidance

2y Clear Books | Sponsored
CGT clampdown nets HMRC £124m – but could lead to increase in use of avoidance schemes

Corporate Tax CGT clampdown nets HMRC £124m – but could lead to increase in use of avoidance schemes

2y Austin Clark, Reporter
‘Google tax’ nets HMRC £281m

Corporate Tax ‘Google tax’ nets HMRC £281m

2y Emma Smith, Managing Editor
Global tax avoidance convention set to be signed by over 60 jurisdictions

Corporate Tax Global tax avoidance convention set to be signed by over 60 jurisdictions

2y Emma Smith, Managing Editor
Autumn Statement: Investment and tax avoidance highlighted in Hammond's speech

Corporate Tax Autumn Statement: Investment and tax avoidance highlighted in Hammond's speech

3y Kevin Reed, Writer