TaxCorporate TaxE&Y managing partner issues riposte to tax avoidance critics

E&Y managing partner issues riposte to tax avoidance critics

Politicians should match their strident rhetoric on tax avoidance with legal change, says Ernst & Young's Mark Otty

POLITICIANS should “stop banging on about morality and change the law” on tax avoidance, according to Ernst & Young’s managing partner for Europe, Middle East and Africa Mark Otty.

Responding to calls for businesses to “pay their fair share”, Otty said a moral code is unlikely to work, given that they have a duty to pay the lowest rate permitted.

Speaking last week at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, the prime minister (pictured) said companies paying little or no tax, such as Starbucks, have to “wake up and smell the coffee”.

“I am a low-tax Conservative, but I’m not a companies-should-pay-no-tax Conservative,” he said. “Individuals and businesses must pay their fair share.”

Following Cameron’s remarks, Otty told the Telegraph the “only way” to resolve the issue is “through legal code”.

“I don’t see how you can have any assessment on payments of tax other than what is in the statute,” he said. “The simplest solution is to stop banging on about morality and change the law.”

Public outrage has mounted throughout the past year over tax contributions made by multinationals, which often move profits from one country to another, frequently resulting in lower tax rates. Amazon, Google and Starbucks in particular have been the subject of public ire over the use of the method, known as transfer pricing.

Recently, Starbucks has threatened to suspend multimillion-pound investments in the UK after repeatedly being the subject of attacks from both politicians and the media over its low tax bills. Investment bank Goldman Sachs, too, has drawn criticism for its tax practices, something chief executive Lloyd Blankfein said risks stigmatising “every right-thinking person who organises his or her affairs in a sensible way”.

For its part, E&Y would not be altering its tax practicesm, according to Otty.

He said: “It comes back to the law. A company has responsibility to its shareholders, its staff and society.

“In days gone by, it was a much easier argument. Now there is this morality test. For an organisation, it becomes very difficult … you don’t know what the rules are or who the arbiter is.”

Starbucks agreed with Cameron that all companies should pay their fair share of tax.

Related Articles

Big names, little tax: Airbnb, Facebook, Kellogg’s, eBay

Corporate Tax Big names, little tax: Airbnb, Facebook, Kellogg’s, eBay

1m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
EU divided over radical tax reforms targeting tech giants

Corporate Tax EU divided over radical tax reforms targeting tech giants

2m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
How to educate your clients about tax avoidance

Corporate Tax How to educate your clients about tax avoidance

2m Clear Books | Sponsored
Colin: Tell them about the money, mummy

Business Regulation Colin: Tell them about the money, mummy

1y Taking Stock
Five key tax and business burdens the chancellor must ease in Autumn Statement

Business Regulation Five key tax and business burdens the chancellor must ease in Autumn Statement

1y Kevin Reed, Writer
CGT clampdown nets HMRC £124m – but could lead to increase in use of avoidance schemes

Corporate Tax CGT clampdown nets HMRC £124m – but could lead to increase in use of avoidance schemes

2m Austin Clark, Reporter
‘Google tax’ nets HMRC £281m

Corporate Tax ‘Google tax’ nets HMRC £281m

2m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
Autumn Statement: Investment and tax avoidance highlighted in Hammond's speech

Corporate Tax Autumn Statement: Investment and tax avoidance highlighted in Hammond's speech

1y Kevin Reed, Writer