THE CHANCELLOR could cut tax relief for pension contributions of richer voters, after shelving plans for a tax based on higher council rates for expensive properties.
George Osborne has, however, promised to strike a balance between a planned scale-back on welfare – expected to achieve a further £10bn of benefit savings by 2015/16 – and new taxes on the wealthy, reports the Financial Times.
While he maintains the move is not part of a “trade-off” with the Conservatives’ Liberal Democrat coalition partners, the search for new revenues is coming to a head in the run-up to his Autumn Statement on 5 December.
Osborne has to hand in his final proposals to the Office for Budget Responsibility by 28 November.
He reportedly met with coalition colleagues on Monday to outline his options, with moves to reduce the tax relief available for wealthier voters on their pensions apparently “on the table”.
In his 2010 emergency Budget, Osborne cut the maximum annual pension contribution exempt from tax from £255,000 to £50,000.
This year’s Autumn Statement is expected to see the maximum contribution dropped to £40,000, which would bring in about £600m, while a further cut to £30,000 would generate £1.8bn, but would likely anger Tory voters.
Other changes expected on 5 December include the use of major investments from wealthy foreign migrants to speed up their settlement in the UK to create a dedicated youth unemployment fund or “Big Society Bond”.
New council tax bands are out of the question after the prime minister expressed concerns it would alienate traditional Tory voters.
As a result, an alternative under consideration is an increase in stamp duty land tax on property sales, although it is thought any additional yield from the step will be modest, with about £70m expected from increasing the 5% rate for properties between £1m and £2m to 6%.
HMRC has outlined a change in VAT policy to the treatment of dwellings that have been formed from either the construction of new buildings, or from the conversion of non-residential buildings
Let us hope that valuable asset protection vehicles are not made prohibitively burdensome or abolished in the desire to “simplify” IHT
The government is pressing ahead with changes to the way it taxes individuals with a foreign domicile
I will feel slightly awkward when I write to the client who is about to receive a large invoice from the PAYE expert, offering him the fee protection going forward