The UK’s financial watchdog, the Financial Services Authority, will explore a
plan to force banks to record modified earnings figures including a “regulatory
Last week, Accountancy Age revealed a plan currently being discussed within
the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) to give regulators a space
within financial statements.
Regulators would control an extra page where companies would record a
modified regulatory income figure. This figure could be used to limit bonus
payments or distributable earnings.
It is hoped the idea would stop regulators smoothing profits and manipulating
accounting data to address concerns that emerged in the wake of the banking
The Financial Services Authority said that while plans were still embryonic
the proposal should be investigated.
“I understand that this is very early days for this IASB proposal so, at this
point, we would just say that the idea is worth an initial exploration,” a
It is for the IASB to take this idea forward with the prudential regulators.”
The FSA has been in favour of a “through the cycle” provision which would
force banks to put money aside in an economic boom to be released in a bust, but
is working with the IASB on a range of possible models.
The comment came as the IASB discusses the plan with the Basel Committee on
The past week saw the proposal gain momentum from within the UK reporting
Ian Wright, director of corporate reporting at the Financial Reporting
Council, said: “Investors would welcome greater information about the views of
“One might reasonably expect a prudential regulator to do what it says on the
tin – offer a cautious view of profits and capital.”
The “extra page” would use net income as a starting point to distill
regulatory numbers. Individual regulators around the world could deduct an
economic cycle reserve or unrealised gains from net income to arrive at a new
“regulatory income” line.
This line could be used to underpin remuneration data or dividend payments.
Significantly, the net income would be preserved so investors are still able
to judge company performance.
Pauline Wallace, head of public policy at PwC and a recent appointee to the
Accounting Standards Board, said any new information has to be underpinned by a
“This is an interesting idea. It is exactly what we should be doing as a
profession, looking at alternative solutions, but we should not ignore the
questions that need to be answered before we can determine how effective it
can be,” she said.
Auditors have also raised concerns about how the arrangement would work in
practice. For example, how would multinational companies reconcile “regulatory
income” from different countries, at a group level. Also, how would regulators
define unrealised gains. UK guidance on the subject stretches to 121 pages.
“We must first understand what is being proposed,” Wallace said.
Meanwhile, Basel is preparing advice on general provisions to be released in
Further powers are being sought by HMRC, but it is ‘failing’ to use those it already has, such as Conduct Notices, says RPC
HMRC breaches client confidentiality; and partner profits fall at EY. These stories and more discussed in Friday Afternoon Live
"The whole idea of HMRC officials supplying confidential information about individuals to the media on a non-attributable basis is, or should be, a matter of serious concern," say Supreme Court judges
Changes to the tax system is urged to support the growth of entrepreneurs, found a report from the Grant Thornton UK, the Institute of Directors, and the Prelude Group