RegulationAccounting StandardsCitigroup in deferred tax accounting row

Citigroup in deferred tax accounting row

Setting aside $50bn funds to cover deferred tax could ‘weaken balance sheet’

Accounting experts and analysts are arguing with the US bank Citigroup over
whether it should set aside $50bn (£32.5bn) to cover its deferred tax assets,
the FT has reported.

The move will reportedly reduce Citigroup’s capital buffer and weaken its
balance sheet. Deferred tax assets amount to more than a third of the bank’s
tangible equity and are the biggest held by any US company.

So far, Citigroup has rejected calls to reserve for its deferred tax assets,
saying it will earn enough in the future to support maintaining the assets on
its books. The bank accumulated the deferred tax assets in part because of its
huge losses during the financial crisis.

According to accounting rules Citigroup has to be confident it will earn
$99bn (£64.4bn) in taxable income during the next two decades to avoid providing
for its deferred tax assets. The dispute has arisen because accounting standards
on deferred tax assets are vague, stating that reserves are not needed if
management believes it is “more likely than not” the company will earn enough
taxable income in the future. However, given that the group’s pre-tax losses
exceeded $60bn (£39bn) in 2008 and 2009, coupled with Citigroup’s own assertion
that it was “very comfortable with the recording of our deferred tax assets,”
some have said the bank is being “too optimistic”.

Lynn Turner, a former chief accountant at the Securities and Exchange
Commission, said: “Citigoup’s position defies imagination and logic. Instead of
talking about making money, what Citigroup ought to do is to reserve for at
least part of the deferred tax assets and reap the benefit of reducing the
reserves once it actually makes money.”

However Richard Bove at Rochdale Securities said he did not believe
Citigroup’s accounts were “out of order due to a misstatement of its DTAs”.

The SEC looked into Citigroup’s deferred tax assets last year and requested
the bank to explain its treatment. The SEC declined to comment on whether it was
still pursuing the matter.

Related Articles

Demystifying GDPR for accountants

Accounting Standards Demystifying GDPR for accountants

2w Ellen Temperton, Lewis Silkin
EY fined £1.8m over Tech Data audit

Accounting Standards EY fined £1.8m over Tech Data audit

2m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
The great professional services shake-up

Accounting Standards The great professional services shake-up

3m Fergus Payne, Lewis Silkin
What do clients actually want from an accountant?

Accounting Standards What do clients actually want from an accountant?

4m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
Accountants shouldn’t neglect hybrid mismatch anti-avoidance rules

Accounting Standards Accountants shouldn’t neglect hybrid mismatch anti-avoidance rules

4m Alison Conley
Membership of the accountancy profession on the rise

Accounting Standards Membership of the accountancy profession on the rise

5m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
The real price of mates' rates in the provision of professional services

Accounting Standards The real price of mates' rates in the provision of professional services

5m DAC Beachcroft
IASB overhauls insurance accounting with issuance of IFRS 17

Accounting Standards IASB overhauls insurance accounting with issuance of IFRS 17

7m Alia Shoaib, Reporter