Medium-sized accountancy firms have lashed out at the idea of mixed accountancy and law practices.
Big Six accountants and many small High Street practitioners are keen to link up with lawyers, after it was revealed the Law Society had discussed lifting its ban on multi-disciplinary practices (MDPs). But few Group A firms are planning to take advantage of the change.
Clive Parritt, chairman of Baker Tilly, is one of the strongest opponents to linking up with lawyers: ‘This would turn law and accounting into a packaged product and, as in a supermarket, the choice you can give the customer is limited. It is unlikely to bring in increased profit, as clients will expect fees for in-house lawyers, or for accountants to be cheaper than using a separate firm.
‘A lot of accountants are probably advising conglomerates to break up and focus on one area of business; why should the professions go the other way?’ he said.
Frank Akers-Douglas, personal tax partner at Smith & Williamson, said: ‘If we had in-house lawyers we would be perceived as being in direct competition with local law firms. We currently receive referred work from legal firms and that would be affected.’
Other firms which have already decided not to become MDPs include Horwath Clark Whitehill, Grant Thornton, Moore Stephens Booth White and Baker Tilly.
Just one half of UK practices have implemented a pricing structure around auto enrolment implementation and advice - with many suffering increased costs
Deloitte's north-west Europe foray; BDO, Smith & Williamson investment paths; Shelley Stock Hutter; and Wilkins Kennedy discussed by editor Kevin Reed on our Friday Afternoon Live broadcast
Accountants should alter their perspective on auto-enrolment to maximise business opportunities, according to Eric Clapton.
Kevin Reed discusses whether new accountancy group Cogital can rival the Big Four...and its likely direction of travel