PracticeConsultingNAO demands reform of ‘shoddy’ IT projects

NAO demands reform of 'shoddy' IT projects

The National Audit Office has made recommendations to improve project management, following the high-profile mismanagement of a government scheme to roll out a national IT system for magistrates' courts.

Link: Spending watchdog slams court IT system

‘Departments should take it as a warning sign that their proposed Private Finance Initiative projects may not be workable if few bidders show initial interest and others withdraw as the procurement process continues,” said Sir John Bourn, auditor general.

Bourn said a best business-process model should be drawn up before any IT solution is sought. In the case of a single tender, departments should take care to ensure value for money by developing an expected-cost model for the bid. He added that up-to-date contingency plans should be in place in case contracts go wrong.

The recommendations follow a report on the shortcomings of the Lord Chancellor’s department’s Libra project to link magistrates’ courts via a single computer system. The project, which the report described as ‘the shoddiest ever’, overran, went over budget and failed to meet users’ needs.

The report said some problems occurred because the department tried to improve existing business processes at the same time as the new IT system was being developed.

The report also criticised the department for only inviting one bidder for the job and so eliminating competitiveness in the procurement process.

When Fujitsu Services – formerly ICL – won the contract in 1998, its first bid was £148m over 11 years, but this rose to £184m over ten-and-a-half years by the time the contract was signed.

The £184m contract was later renegotiated twice, first because ICL had overestimated revenues and underestimated costs. In May 2000, a price of £319m was agreed for a new 14-and-a-half year contract. ICL and the department later began renegotiations, but were unable to reach agreement.

Although ICL was in breach of the contract, the department continued with the deal to avoid potentially expensive court costs.

In July 2002, a new contract was signed for £232m over eight-and-a-half years to deliver a national IT infrastructure and office automation facilities.

Related Articles

5 tips for SMEs to protect cash flow

Accounting Software 5 tips for SMEs to protect cash flow

5m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
Tyrie on Finance Bill 2017: ‘Making Tax Policy Better’

Consulting Tyrie on Finance Bill 2017: ‘Making Tax Policy Better’

11m Stephanie Wix, Writer
Managing partner Q&A - the year ahead: Richard Toone, CVR Global

Accounting Firms Managing partner Q&A - the year ahead: Richard Toone, CVR Global

12m Kevin Reed, Writer
Deloitte 'self-imposes exile' on government contracts to defuse PM row

Accounting Firms Deloitte 'self-imposes exile' on government contracts to defuse PM row

12m Kevin Reed, Writer
Managing partner Q&A - the year ahead: Julie Adams, Menzies

Accounting Firms Managing partner Q&A - the year ahead: Julie Adams, Menzies

12m Kevin Reed, Writer
Friday Afternoon Live: Deloitte's tech thing; PAC wants HMRC 'contingencies'; and Sports Direct

Business Regulation Friday Afternoon Live: Deloitte's tech thing; PAC wants HMRC 'contingencies'; and Sports Direct

1y Kevin Reed, Writer
Friday Afternoon Live: HMRC complaints rise; Deloitte scoops big audits; and corporate reporting woes

Audit Friday Afternoon Live: HMRC complaints rise; Deloitte scoops big audits; and corporate reporting woes

1y Kevin Reed, Writer
New head of equity capital markets for KPMG

Accounting Firms New head of equity capital markets for KPMG

1y Stephanie Wix, Writer