HMRC to press on with LLP tax changes

by Calum Fuller

More from this author

24 Feb 2014

  • Comments
HMRC building

PARTNERS AT LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIPS will have to comply with one of three tests in order to satisfy the tax authorities they should not be treated as employees, new guidance shows.

HMRC and the Treasury are concerned that limited liability partnership structures allow "disguised employment" to take place, whereby people who are ostensibly partners in fact have a guaranteed income and little decision-making power. The worry for the government is that the well-established arrangement gives rise to tax discrepancies.

The guidance shows that, despite widespread adviser disquiet over the breadth of firms that could be caught within the regime, officials are pressing ahead with its introduction.

Originally expected on 17 February, the guidance shows the legislation will be introduced in the Finance Bill 2014 when it receives Royal assent, likely to be by 6 April. The three-point test HMRC is set to be imposed in order to determine a staff member's status.

Under the draft proposals, partners must satisfy one of three tests in order to maintain their status. The first option is ensuring at least a quarter of their pay is profit-dependent; the second would see them contribute at least 25% of their ‘fixed pay' to the firm's capital; or the third option is to prove they have significant influence on the overall partnership.

If partners are deemed to be employees, then employer's national insurance contributions at 13.8% will be due and other employment-related tax rules, such as benefits in kind and share scheme rules, will apply to them.

Menzies tax partner Richard Godmon said: "Why they couldn't delay implementation for 12 months so that professional firms had more time to reorganise, or even better simply change the offending tax legislation... so LLP partners are not deemed self-employed, but are tested by the normal rules, I do not know.

"These changes seem to encapsulate everything that is wrong with how we operate our tax system, something is initially poorly drafted and allows scope for tax avoidance, so then there is then more legislation to try and fix the problem."

Visitor comments

blog comments powered by Disqus

Add your comment

We won't publish your address

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms & Conditions

Your comment will be moderated before publication

  • Send


Financial Planner

The Ministry of Defence Surgeon General’s (SG) Finance Department, Lichfield, Staffordshire, Permanent, Full Time, £ £30,008




Get the latest financial news sent directly to your inbox

  • Best Practice
  • Business
  • Daily Newsletter
  • Essentials


Search for jobs
Click to search our database of all the latest accountancy roles

Create a profile
Click to set up your profile and let the best recruiters find you

Jobs by email
Sign up to receive regular updates with the latest roles suitable for you



Why budgeting fails: One management system is not enough

If budgeting is to have any value at all, it needs a radical overhaul. In today's dynamic marketplace, budgeting can no longer serve as a company's only management system; it must integrate with and support dedicated strategy management systems, process improvement systems, and the like. In this paper, Professor Peter Horvath and Dr Ralf Sauter present what's wrong with the current approach to budgeting and how to fix it.


iXBRL: Taking stock. Looking forward

In this white paper CCH provide checklists to help accountants and finance professionals both in practice and in business examine these issues and make plans. Also includes a case study of a large commercial organisation working through the first year of mandatory iXBRL filing.