Auditors' going concern judgment to extend beyond 12 months

by Richard Crump

More from this author

31 Jan 2013

  • Comments

AUDITORS will have to determine companies' ongoing financial health over a longer period of time and under wider criteria, according to draft proposals put forward by the Financial Reporting Council (FRC).

The UK reporting watchdog has said that accountants would have to consider threats to clients' business model and capital adequacy through the economic cycle and the companies' own business cycle.

Auditors only attest to a company as a going concern, meaning it has enough cash or access to capital to survive for the following 12 months, but this will be extended to a period longer than a year under the FRC's new guidelines, which remain subject to consultation.

In addition, the FRC said auditors must be confident that a company's solvency and liquidity risks can be managed for at least a year, that there has been a "robust" going concern assessment, and they must disclose how the risks are being managed.

The recommendations, which would apply to all listed companies that must be audited, are in response to Lord Sharman's inquiry into going concern and liquidity risks.

The panel was set up by the FRC in 2011 to investigate auditors' shortcomings in the wake of the financial crisis, particularly how banks' accounts were given the all clear by auditors before subsequently needing to be bailed out by taxpayers' funds.

Lord Sharman said the proposals would be radical for many companies, but "if implemented effectively, they will: support better risk decision‐taking; ensure that investors, creditors and other stakeholders are well‐protected and informed about the going concern risks; and sustain an environment in which directors recognise, acknowledge and respond to economic and financial distress sooner rather than later."

However, KPMG has warned that the FRC may be setting companies a "high hurdle" by forcing them to consider whether they are a going concern over the general economic cycle.

"My concern is that it will be difficult for many companies to meet what appears to be such a tough test," said Tony Cates, head of audit at KPMG.

The consultation is open for comments until 28 April 2013.

Visitor comments

blog comments powered by Disqus

Add your comment

We won't publish your address

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms & Conditions

Your comment will be moderated before publication

  • Send


Financial Planner

The Ministry of Defence Surgeon General’s (SG) Finance Department, Lichfield, Staffordshire, Permanent, Full Time, £ £30,008




Get the latest financial news sent directly to your inbox

  • Best Practice
  • Business
  • Daily Newsletter
  • Essentials


Search for jobs
Click to search our database of all the latest accountancy roles

Create a profile
Click to set up your profile and let the best recruiters find you

Jobs by email
Sign up to receive regular updates with the latest roles suitable for you



Why budgeting fails: One management system is not enough

If budgeting is to have any value at all, it needs a radical overhaul. In today's dynamic marketplace, budgeting can no longer serve as a company's only management system; it must integrate with and support dedicated strategy management systems, process improvement systems, and the like. In this paper, Professor Peter Horvath and Dr Ralf Sauter present what's wrong with the current approach to budgeting and how to fix it.


iXBRL: Taking stock. Looking forward

In this white paper CCH provide checklists to help accountants and finance professionals both in practice and in business examine these issues and make plans. Also includes a case study of a large commercial organisation working through the first year of mandatory iXBRL filing.