A UNITARY TAX would be time-consuming to implement and could prove more complex than transfer pricing, according to tax chiefs from PwC and the OECD in letters to the Financial Times.
Unitary taxation, where corporations would pay on a jurisdiction-by-jurisdiction basis, would “inevitably lead to double-taxation of corporate profits as countries construct different rules”, according to Will Morris, tax committee chairman of the OECD.
Currently, the principle for dividing international profit is based on the price a business would have to pay to gain goods and services from operations in other countries – the ‘arm’s length principle’.
There is “merit” in exploring the unitary system on global or European basis, said PwC head of tax Kevin Nicholson. However, he acknowledged the timescales involved in reaching any kind of consensus dictates the chancellor should focus on providing HM Revenue & Customs with greater resources to combat the use of transfer pricing – which allows companies to shift profits outside of the UK to lower tax jurisdictions – to drive down UK liabilities.
“This [granting the Revenue greater resources] would both give confidence to the public that the system is working fairly and assist businesses that want to ensure they comply fairly with the arm’s length principle,” he said.
George Osborne is likely to heed their advice and allocate £77m of HMRC’s budget a year to tackle tax avoidance arrangements, including transfer pricing.
The chancellor is due to make his Autumn Statement on Wednesday 5 December.
Phillip Gershuny, senior tax partner at Hogan Lovells, outlines how a European exit could affect UK taxes
London accountancy firm Blick Rothenberg warns of potential damages VAT changes could cause UK businesses
Two PwC whistleblowers and journalist to stand trial over alleged leaking of corporate tax documents
Governmental pressure to crack down on tax evasion is resulting in HMRC applying its criminal investigation policy in an inconsistent manner, writes Kingsley Napley's David Sleight