THE PROMOTION and mis-selling of tax schemes with no real prospect of working should be challenged, according to the president of the Chartered Institute of Taxation.
Speaking at the CIoT's annual parliamentary reception, Patrick Stevens said rules governing the sale of artificial schemes needed to be treated in the same way as the financial services mis-selling rules. However, he stopped short of suggesting more legislation was required.
He said: "We need to consider the nature of the schemes that claim to wipe out income tax. Many people in my profession believe that most of them simply do not work, and indeed that they shouldn't work.
"If we built on the financial services mis-selling rules, they would attack the promoters and sellers of schemes that have no real prospect of working – who are the ones who really make the money from such arrangements."
He went on to add that morality and parliament's intention "only gets us so far", and that "fundamentally, tax bills must be based on the law, not on a possibly arbitrary view or decision".
A general anti-abuse rule (GAAR) is currently under consultation in order to tackle avoidance schemes that go against the intention of existing tax law.
You may also like
If budgeting is to have any value at all, it needs a radical overhaul. In today's dynamic marketplace, budgeting can no longer serve as a company's only management system; it must integrate with and support dedicated strategy management systems, process improvement systems, and the like. In this paper, Professor Peter Horvath and Dr Ralf Sauter present what's wrong with the current approach to budgeting and how to fix it.
In this white paper CCH provide checklists to help accountants and finance professionals both in practice and in business examine these issues and make plans. Also includes a case study of a large commercial organisation working through the first year of mandatory iXBRL filing.