05 Oct 2011
THE US HAS WON three tax shelter cases, one involving KPMG.
In WFC Holdings, Minnesota district court judge John Tunheim disallowed an $80m (£51.7m) tax refund claim filed by a subsidiary of Wells Fargo.
Further reading
The tax claim, relating to an alleged loss from a sale of stock, was ruled to be a "sham tax shelter" it had purchased from KPMG for $3m, and "that it had no business purpose other than tax avoidance".
Another case saw a partnership classed as "sham" by the courts, blocking an attempt to deduct $200m in income tax deductions.
The third case saw Principal Life Insurance's claim for more than $20m in foreign tax credits prevented. The transaction bringing rise to the claim, designed by Citibank, was deemed to be a loan rather than an equity investment, lacked economic substance and a business purpose - violating the US Treasury's 'anti-abuse' regulation.
"These three significant decisions are further evidence that the courts will not countenance abusive tax shelters, no matter who designs them or how complicated they are," said John DiCicco, principal deputy assistant attorney general of the Justice Department's tax division.
"Large corporations and wealthy individuals should think twice before pouring money into these sham arrangements."
You may also like
Careers
Search for jobs
Click to search our database of all the latest accountancy roles
Create a profile
Click to set up your profile and let the best recruiters find you
Jobs by email
Sign up to receive regular updates with the latest roles suitable for you
Briefings
By looking at the reasons supplier statements became unfashionable, and the reasons why it is different today, this paper delves into the many benefits that can be obtained by automating the process.
Having a real and true view of your organisation’s current financial position, and having the right systems and processes in place, will ensure that you can make strong choices and are ready to capitalise on opportunities
Visitor comments Add your comment