Opinion: US’ hissy fit sees it take its tax home

Opinion: US' hissy fit sees it take its tax home

Baker Tilly tax partner Rebecca Reading analyses the US's latest move to discourage tax inversions

PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA this week announced plans to tax the retained overseas earnings of US companies. The proposals recommend a 14% ‘toll-charge’ tax on profits currently held offshore, plus an annual charge of 19% thereafter. Unsurprisingly, businesses’ initial reaction was shock and dismay.

Fundamentally, although the idea is presented as being about fairness (isn’t everything?) and about making US companies pay more tax, it is in practice about making non-US subsidiaries pay US tax and seemingly indiscriminately at that! So, the logic is that the US levies tax on the whole world.

It is hard to believe a mature tax jurisdiction like the US would even entertain such an idea, especially when other developed countries, the UK included, have gone in the other direction, lowering domestic tax rates and narrowing their anti-avoidance rules that can bring offshore profits from artificial arrangements back into the domestic tax net. The UK has been criticised for being too lenient in this area, but this US measure is completely at the other end of the spectrum.

Critics of the OECD/G20 BEPS project have suggested it is doomed to fail unless the US undergoes a monumental shift in perspective in terms of the principles underlying its tax system. The OECD’s stated objective is to align taxing rights with economic activity and to ensure a fairer and more consistent set of international rules is achieved. This move by Obama suggests the opposite: the US it seems will tax all subsidiaries – period. No link to economic activity required – just a blanket tax charge on everyone, everywhere.

Now doesn’t that make the UK an attractive place to do business?

Rebecca Reading is a tax partner at Baker Tilly

Whitepaper

The Future of Finance is in the CFO's Hands

Business The Future of Finance is in the CFO's Hands

3m
Save a Week a Month Consolidating Accounts

Accounting Software Save a Week a Month Consolidating Accounts

4m
Mitigating Risk Through Internal Control

Legal Mitigating Risk Through Internal Control

5m
Could tax season have run more efficiently?

Corporate Tax Could tax season have run more efficiently?

5m

Related Articles

Appropriate tax systems – taxation in the ‘Fourth Industrial Revolution’

Corporate Tax Appropriate tax systems – taxation in the ‘Fourth Industrial Revolution’

11m Jane Mackay, Crowe
Big names, little tax: Airbnb, Facebook, Kellogg’s, eBay

Corporate Tax Big names, little tax: Airbnb, Facebook, Kellogg’s, eBay

2y Alia Shoaib, Reporter
EU divided over radical tax reforms targeting tech giants

Corporate Tax EU divided over radical tax reforms targeting tech giants

2y Alia Shoaib, Reporter
How to educate your clients about tax avoidance

Corporate Tax How to educate your clients about tax avoidance

2y Clear Books | Sponsored
CGT clampdown nets HMRC £124m – but could lead to increase in use of avoidance schemes

Corporate Tax CGT clampdown nets HMRC £124m – but could lead to increase in use of avoidance schemes

2y Austin Clark, Reporter
‘Google tax’ nets HMRC £281m

Corporate Tax ‘Google tax’ nets HMRC £281m

2y Emma Smith, Managing Editor
Autumn Statement: Investment and tax avoidance highlighted in Hammond's speech

Corporate Tax Autumn Statement: Investment and tax avoidance highlighted in Hammond's speech

3y Kevin Reed, Writer
Colin: Tell them about the money, mummy

Business Regulation Colin: Tell them about the money, mummy

3y Taking Stock