TaxPersonal TaxThe Practitioner: Why does HMRC persist in making us look bad?

The Practitioner: Why does HMRC persist in making us look bad?

HMRC and Companies House 'flapping' is causing clients consternation - with The Practitioner on the receiving end

The Practitioner: Why does HMRC persist in making us look bad?

BY SENDING OUT wrong demands and incorrect penalty notices they not only upset clients unnecessarily but what are they wasting in terms of paper and postage costs?

All the years I have been in accountancy, looking after clients, my heart still sinks  when I sense from their tone that they think we’ve done something wrong.

More often than not they have received something from HMRC that indicates we haven’t been doing our job properly. It couldn’t be further from the truth, and since opening our doors we are client-penalty-free – both from HMRC and Companies House.

While I’m thinking about it, Companies House is just as guilty as HMRC for spooking clients. In the past month alone I’ve had phone calls from distressed clients who have received an ‘Urgent Reminder to File Annual Return.’ It is printed in red ink and makes clients believe that they, or we, have overlooked something.

These so-called ‘urgent reminders’ are being sent out despite the fact that there are normally a couple of weeks to go until the actual filing deadline.

No matter how good we are at reassuring clients that everything is in hand they must have a little doubt in the back of their minds that there is no smoke without fire.

Another tax scare

A client of mine has recently been on the end of another unnecessary HMRC scare. A collector from the tax office phoned the client advising them he had 48 hours to pay a rather large PAYE liability. After receiving the news from a rather upset client I contacted HMRC directly only to find they had fabricated a CIS return submission figure and misallocated a payment.

I’m not being unfair when I say the lady who dealt with my query couldn’t have sounded any less disinterested if she tried. At the end of the call she said something along the lines of ‘OK, not sure what’s happened there but I’ll take your word for it and put a permanent hold on any future chase for the amount.’

In this case I was happy that they were willing to ‘write-off’ an amount that had only occurred because of their error, but how many genuine outstanding liabilities are being put on ‘permanent hold’ because the person on the end of the phone can’t be bothered to look into it?

Yet more waste…

The Practitioner’s uncensored thoughts come from within their own practice – having left a regional firm in the heart of England

Related Articles

HMRC tax evasion assistance requests double in five years

Corporate Tax HMRC tax evasion assistance requests double in five years

3m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
Rangers tax case to have ‘dramatic’ consequences for football and business

Legal Rangers tax case to have ‘dramatic’ consequences for football and business

3m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
HMRC collects record £5bn in inheritance tax

HMRC HMRC collects record £5bn in inheritance tax

3m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
PAC raises “serious concerns” about HMRC’s digital plans

Corporate Tax PAC raises “serious concerns” about HMRC’s digital plans

10m Stephanie Wix, Writer
Autumn Statement: MTD followup in New Year, frustrating some advisers

Accounting Software Autumn Statement: MTD followup in New Year, frustrating some advisers

10m Stephanie Wix, Writer
The top three issues that the next government must address for accountants

Making Tax Digital The top three issues that the next government must address for accountants

3m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
HMRC cuts over 150 offices to reduce running costs

Corporate Tax HMRC cuts over 150 offices to reduce running costs

8m Stephanie Wix, Writer
Finance Bill 2017: Corporate tax reporting requirements 'a burden'

Business Regulation Finance Bill 2017: Corporate tax reporting requirements 'a burden'

9m Stephanie Wix, Writer