RegulationAccounting StandardsKeeping Up Appearances – how to spot accounting manipulation

Keeping Up Appearances - how to spot accounting manipulation

Jeanine Arnold discusses the many forms of accounting manipulation

IN 2011 MANY COMPANIES experienced strong performance in the first few quarters followed by a weakening later in the year. This, combined with a weak outlook for 2012, may prompt some to smooth results and resort to increasingly aggressive accounting techniques to manipulate performance metrics or achieve compliance with target ratios and covenants.

But how are these companies manipulating the figures, they can’t lie after all. The most common areas for manipulation techniques include cut-off manipulation, percentage of completion (POC) accounting, the capitalisation of expenses, the use of derivatives and operating leases, provisioning, and the accounting for subsidiaries and joint ventures.

More general techniques can include reorganising segments of the books, redefining key target ratios or timing the adoption of accounting standards. Forms of manipulation will also often vary between industry sectors. The retail, media and automotive sectors are more susceptible to revenue cut-off practices whilst construction, aerospace, defence and software companies are more obvious candidates for manipulating POC accounting.

While auditors are the first line of defence, a principles-based IFRS framework gives management considerable flexibility in making accounting policy choices. In particular, estimates are key to all accounts and while these must be based on reliable assumptions, they increase the scope for manipulation – without the need for fraud or illegal practices.

Other more obviously warning signs to look out for include a sharp unexplained improvement in a company’s operating margins, significant mismatches between the profit and loss and cash flow or a noticeable rise in trade debtor payments or deferred income.

At times, accounting standards can fall short in appropriately reflecting a company’s future financing needs. One such example is the accounting for subsidiaries under the equity method, which is determined by the legal form of ownership rather than the reputational or operational importance of a parent providing finance to a subsidiary. New standards will be more prescriptive in accounting for joint arrangements such as subsidiaries, but will remain limited to prevent manipulation. Proforma accounts are an important tool, but again analysts and auditors should be cautious about taking these at face value.

Jeanine Arnold is associate director of Fitch Ratings

Related Articles

Tesco suspends execs and call in Deloitte over profits overstatement

Accounting Standards Tesco suspends execs and call in Deloitte over profits overstatement

3y Chris Warmoll, Writer
US lawmakers call for preservation of cash accounting

Accounting Standards US lawmakers call for preservation of cash accounting

3y Richard Crump, Writer
Betfair pays £80m to investors contrary to accounting rules

Accounting Standards Betfair pays £80m to investors contrary to accounting rules

3y Naomi Rainey, Writer
HP says accounting a 'ridiculous' excuse for Autonomy writedown

Accounting Standards HP says accounting a 'ridiculous' excuse for Autonomy writedown

4y Kevin Reed, Writer
BT criticised over its accounting for network costs

Accounting Standards BT criticised over its accounting for network costs

4y Kevin Reed, Writer
Annual reports serving too many masters

Accounting Standards Annual reports serving too many masters

4y Richard Crump, Writer
BIS warned on consequences of raising audit thresholds

Accounting Standards BIS warned on consequences of raising audit thresholds

4y Richard Crump, Writer
Colin: Don't play fast and loose with accounts

Accounting Standards Colin: Don't play fast and loose with accounts

4y Taking Stock