RegulationAccounting StandardsNo easy choices for the ASB on moves to IFRS

No easy choices for the ASB on moves to IFRS

Push on as planned or not – the ASB faces a tough decision over IFRS implementation

Is it or isn’t it a burden? That’s the question facing the introduction of
international accounting standards for SMEs. As far as the Department for
Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS) is concerned the jury remains in
deliberation.

Accountancy Age has seen a key letter from BIS to the UK Accounting Standards
Board which reveals the opinion of government officials. They believe IFRS
“could well” involve
a significant cost for SMEs and that ministers attach “importance” to a change
in accounting code resulting in a “net reduction in burdens on business”.

The pressure is therefore on the ASB to ensure that a change to IFRS is a
cost benefit and not just an extra cost.

This position is easily anticipated. The economic environment is still tough
on business and the government is reluctant to be seen backing anything that
makes life more difficult for the those running small businesses.

Times have been hard enough. More importantly, though, in the midst of huge
spending cuts, government wants business to push the economy forward.

Government support for IFRS then rests on what it does for the economy – and
politicians these days are more sensitive to that than most.

The ASB finds itself in a difficult position. It has been looking at a change
in the UK accounting code for something like eight years. Consultations have
indicated a desire for change, UK GAAP is not being properly maintained and
currently exists as a hodge-podge of inconsistent standards. Something simpler
is required. Unfortunately, the timing is
less than satisfactory.

Plus, there is an outstanding argument that though consultations have taken
place, the polling is yet to really reach the people who use the standards. The
mass of small companies that make up most of the UK economy are notoriously
difficult to reach.

The ASB, a body independent of government, is in an invidious position. The
danger here in pushing ahead is that it is seen as an unthinking body of
bureaucrats inured to the
view of small businesses and the burdens they carry. Its reputation for judgment
and understanding could be seriously damaged. Likewise, its relationship with
government could become tense.

The choices are: push ahead as planned; push ahead but soften the blow; or
delay. Sense would suggest that one of the latter two options is in the ASB’s
agenda.

However, softening the blow could mean many things and standard setters would
need to be sure they do something of substance rather than offering a simple
headline.

There are no easy choices here. But that is in the nature of the times.

Related Articles

Don’t delay reporting changes warn firms

Accounting Standards Don’t delay reporting changes warn firms

6y Rachael Singh, Writer
ASB reporting proposals fail to address micro companies

Accounting Standards ASB reporting proposals fail to address micro companies

6y Richard Crump, Writer
SME accounting should retain UK GAAP aspects

Accounting Standards SME accounting should retain UK GAAP aspects

6y Rachael Singh, Writer
ASB proposes reform of income tax reporting

Accounting Standards ASB proposes reform of income tax reporting

6y Accountancy Age, Reporters
EU standard setters say ‘no thanks’ to IFRS for SMEs

Accounting Standards EU standard setters say ‘no thanks’ to IFRS for SMEs

6y Rose Orlik
Setters bring financial instruments standard in line

Accounting Standards Setters bring financial instruments standard in line

6y Rose Orlik
E&Y: Speak now to keep reduced disclosure option

Accounting Standards E&Y: Speak now to keep reduced disclosure option

7y Rose Orlik
Charity accountant warns of burdensome new standards

Accounting Standards Charity accountant warns of burdensome new standards

7y Rose Orlik