The lessons from Equitable life

The lessons from Equitable life

The investigation into Ernst & Young's audit of Equitable Life has opened fresh debate over the role of audit

The debacle over the audit of Equitable Life by Ernst & Young finally
came to a close at the end of last week when the report of an appeal tribunal
was published.

An earlier tribunal convened by the Joint Disciplinary Scheme had severely
reprimanded Ernst & Young and auditor Kevin McNamara, imposed a £4.2m fine
and awarded costs against them.

On appeal the fine was reduced to £500,000 and costs to £2.4m. The penalty
was also changed to a “reprimand”, removing the “severe” element.

At stake in the appeal was the charge that McNamara and E&Y had
compromised their objectivity and independence in dealing with the Equitable
audit.

The appeal document makes for fascinating reading as it weighs the arguments
and sometimes enters into almost philosophical areas to consider the issues.

In the end the appeal tribunal decided there was no evidence of a lack of
independence and objectivity, but the technical issues on which this case rested
will be worth reviewing for any auditor who has been in place for long periods
with the same client.

In fact, what the case presents is cause to stop and reflect on how it is
that an auditor not only maintains but also demonstrates his independence from
the client.

For those who have been with same client for years, they will need to think
about those issues more intensely now in the wake of the Equitable Life ruling,
because it is an area where their work and conduct could be challenged in the
event that disaster strikes
Auditors will need to think about their processes, the relationship with the
client, the personal relationships even record keeping.

Moreover, auditors will need to think about the quality and thoroughness of
their work. It was the failure to conduct a key piece of work in the Equitable
Life audit that led to the allegations about objectivity and independence.

The appeal concluded that faulty work could not be seen as meaning
objectivity has been compromised. Regulators will need to take that conclusion
on board. Auditors will need to think about how these allegations arise, even
when unfounded, and how they ensure such suspicians are headed off even before
they take hold.

And this is critical because without objectivity and independence an audit is
next to worthless. It is the core principle an auditor should abide by and the
element that reassures company owners.

Equitable demonstates why it needs to be maintained and protected.

Share

Subscribe to get your daily business insights

Resources & Whitepapers

Why Professional Services Firms Should Ditch Folders and Embrace Metadata
Professional Services

Why Professional Services Firms Should Ditch Folders and Embrace Metadata

3y

Why Professional Services Firms Should Ditch Folde...

In the past decade, the professional services industry has transformed significantly. Digital disruptions, increased competition, and changing market ...

View resource
2 Vital keys to Remaining Competitive for Professional Services Firms

2 Vital keys to Remaining Competitive for Professional Services Firms

3y

2 Vital keys to Remaining Competitive for Professi...

In recent months, professional services firms are facing more pressure than ever to deliver value to clients. Often, clients look at the firms own inf...

View resource
Turn Accounts Payable into a value-engine
Accounting Firms

Turn Accounts Payable into a value-engine

3y

Turn Accounts Payable into a value-engine

In a world of instant results and automated workloads, the potential for AP to drive insights and transform results is enormous. But, if you’re still ...

View resource
Digital Links: A guide to MTD in 2021
Making Tax Digital

Digital Links: A guide to MTD in 2021

3y

Digital Links: A guide to MTD in 2021

The first phase of Making Tax Digital (MTD) saw the requirement for the digital submission of the VAT Return using compliant software. That’s now behi...

View resource