PracticeAccounting FirmsPolitical intervention: defensive position

Political intervention: defensive position

The profession must stand up to the politicians

The intervention of politicians in financial reporting issues is nothing new.
Those with long memories will recall inflation accounting and deferred taxes in
the UK or accounting for derivatives, stock options and oil and gas exploration
costs in the USA. Those with shorter memories may recall President Chirac’s
claim that the requirements of IAS 39 would have
‘nefarious consequences for financial stability’.

Political intervention is not surprising. Accounting requirements affect the
relative interests of different stakeholders and, therefore, have political
consequences. Politicians and bureaucrats tend to support influential groups
that claim they will be the losers ­ hence their willingness to seek the easing
of the rules on fair value accounting.

It is an easy target because it appears to be something new imposed by the
adoption of IFRS. However, the losses that banks and others want to hide arise
in the context of historical cost rather than fair value. The banks should have
recognised these losses under their national GAAPs as well as IFRS.

The term ‘fair value accounting’ implies that all assets and liabilities must
be measured at fair value at each balance sheet date and the resulting gains and
losses included in profit and loss. IFRS require this form of fair value
accounting for derivatives and other held-for-trading financial assets. Rightly
or wrongly, the IASB believes that this is the only meaningful way to account
for these items.

For virtually everything else, IFRS follows the same historical cost model
that has been in existence for decades. As all accountants know, the carrying
amounts of assets under this model should not exceed the amount that can be
obtained from their use, sale or other means of recovery. Some might call this
prudence.

Those calling for the easing of fair value accounting want to hide losses
that should be recognised under both historical cost and fair value accounting.
They want to assign the blame for bad or ill-informed decision-making on the
accounting. As Lynn Turner, former chief accountant at the SEC, argued, they
will tell lies to investors if they pretend that loan assets are worth more than
the borrower will repay.

Such accounting may be acceptable to politicians. But, as a profession, we
should tell them we will not be associated with it.

David Cairns is a visiting professor at the
London School of
Economics

Related Articles

BDO’s global revenues pass $8bn

Accounting Firms BDO’s global revenues pass $8bn

4d Alia Shoaib, Reporter
Top 40 International Networks, Associations and Alliances: Finding growth amid uncertainty

Accounting Firms Top 40 International Networks, Associations and Alliances: Finding growth amid uncertainty

7d Philip Smith, Reporter
Top 40 International Networks, Associations and Alliances 2017: Big Four tussle for top spot

Accounting Firms Top 40 International Networks, Associations and Alliances 2017: Big Four tussle for top spot

1w Emma Smith, Managing Editor
BDO reports revenue growth of 5.7%

Accounting Firms BDO reports revenue growth of 5.7%

2w Alia Shoaib, Reporter
Taylorcocks announces merger with Surrey firm

Accounting Firms Taylorcocks announces merger with Surrey firm

2w Emma Smith, Managing Editor
Kingston Smith reports 7% gender pay gap

Accounting Firms Kingston Smith reports 7% gender pay gap

2w Emma Smith, Managing Editor
RSM announces two partner promotions

Accounting Firms RSM announces two partner promotions

3w Emma Smith, Managing Editor
Backsourcing: The latest accountancy trend?

Accounting Firms Backsourcing: The latest accountancy trend?

1m Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman