Make no mistake: FRS 17 has never been popular with British business.
Only a fortnight ago a study by banker HSBC warned the new standard requiring companies to value their pension funds at market values, not historic values, could be harmful to some of Britain’s largest companies.
Yet last week international airport group BAA reported an operating profit of #355m under the new controversial accounting standard.
BAA is one of the few companies that has opted for early adoption of the new accounting rule, which takes effect in stages until 2003.
Admittedly that same result would have been some #19m higher pre-FRS 17. But that’s hardly the volatility we were warned about. And that came in a depressed market.
But is there anything wrong with the fundamental principle of using market valuations? Who knows, perhaps we will hear fewer warnings of ‘volatility’ once the stock market recovers.
Does Darwin's theory apply to taxation? Colin ponders...
The EC has been instructed to draft a European Union (EU) directive authorising an EU financial transaction tax, which would apply to ten of the EU’s 28 member states
Accountancy watchdog the FRC has dropped its investigation into the former chief financial officer of Tesco, nearly two years after the supermarket was engulfed in an accounting scandal
Colin imagines how Apple's logo might change in the wake of the EC's ruling over its Irish tax arrangements