TaxPersonal TaxSmall businesses deserve better treatment from the Inland Revenue on transfer pricing

Small businesses deserve better treatment from the Inland Revenue on transfer pricing

Transfer pricing is a hot issue. It affects the very large multinationals as well as the smaller global businesses. All businesses are concerned to have certainty in their transfer prices with associated entities.

The Inland Revenue’s recent guidance notes on APA’s includes reference to the fact that it will not discriminate against small tax payers or against smaller transactions, but elsewhere in the guidance it reserves the right to decline such APA requests.

The Statement of Practice 3/99 clearly states that it recognises ‘that complex transfer pricing issues can be encountered by smaller tax payers as well as by large multinationals, and applications will not be declined by reference to the size of the transactions giving rise to the transfer pricing issues’.

However, the Statement of Practice goes on to state that APA requests may be declined where it appears to be an ‘inefficient use of resources’ to pursue an APA ‘because the transactions are of very limited nature…or are of limited value to the rest of the business’. Where does this take us?

It is not clear whether taxpayers should find the Inland Revenue’s Statement reassuring. Maybe, if a request is refused the Inland Revenue are signaling that the matter would not be worthy of investigation under self assessment! The Revenue have indicated that they may be prepared in certain cases (e.g. cost plus arrangements) to come to a ruling under a different procedure, Code of Practice 10. This normally offers certainty in relation to a particular period. APA’s are designed to last for 3 to 5 years. Would a Code of Practice 10 ruling last for a similar timeframe?

The timing for agreement of an APA is of great concern as well. The Revenue have stated 18 months as a goal for completing APA requests. Admittedly APA’s instituted through other tax authorities, particularly the US, have taken 2 to 3 years to reach agreement. Surely business should expect better.

We should be aiming to nearer 6 months than 18 months.

Taxman accused of favouring big business on transfer pricing

Related Articles

LITRG urges government to consider tax changes in disability work plan

Administration LITRG urges government to consider tax changes in disability work plan

2d Lucy Skoulding, Reporter
HMRC appeal rejected in Tottenham Hotspur case

Administration HMRC appeal rejected in Tottenham Hotspur case

2w Emma Smith, Managing Editor
HMRC urged to clarify impact of income allowances on Self-Assessments

Personal Tax HMRC urged to clarify impact of income allowances on Self-Assessments

2m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
New trading allowance: simplicity, but not as we know it

Administration New trading allowance: simplicity, but not as we know it

2m Emma Rawson, ATT Technical Officer
Wealthy individuals could circumvent top tax rate rises

Personal Tax Wealthy individuals could circumvent top tax rate rises

4m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
Italy grants first successful non-dom status application to former UK non-dom

Personal Tax Italy grants first successful non-dom status application to former UK non-dom

4m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
Industry reaction: Taylor Review does not go far enough in addressing tax issues

Legal Industry reaction: Taylor Review does not go far enough in addressing tax issues

5m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
Does the Taylor Review sufficiently address the gig economy?

Corporate Tax Does the Taylor Review sufficiently address the gig economy?

5m Alia Shoaib, Reporter