PracticeAccounting FirmsThis week’s blogs: a step too far

This week's blogs: a step too far

Bloggers discuss a threat to senior officers, secondment opportunities and shell’s PR disaster

Slipped into the small print of the 2009 Budget bundle was a proposal to make
senior accounting officers personally liable for their companies’ tax accounting
arrangements.

It is a proposal that has caused consternation, not just within the
profession but more widely within the business community.

Ultimately, it is the collective responsibility of the directors as a whole
to maintain proper systems. Of course, the company should be penalised where it
submits an incorrect return due to poor systems but to take that one step
further by making the senior accounting officer personally liable would, in my
view, not be the right course.

If the government is concerned about internal accounting systems, then a more
targeted approach rather than a blanket measure that applies to all large
companies would be a better way forward. Through its existing risk analysis
procedures, HMRC should be able to identify companies that it believes do not
have adequate accounting systems. Targeting these would be a better strategy to
pursue.

Michael Izza, CEO, ICAEW
ion.icaew.com/MoorgatePlace

On qualification, we will finally have all the options open to us that we
were informed of at the start of our studies. One of the possibilities is a
secondment to another department within our own firm. This provides many
benefits. It gives the chance to experience another part of the accountancy
world before deciding what step to take next.

There are many departments available to try out, including corporate
recovery, corporate finance and forensics. Each provides separate challenges, so
it is possible to seek out those that you feel you will most enjoy. It is good
to have such a selection available, and so these are exciting times indeed for
any students approaching qualification.

I already have some ideas as to what I plan to do, although obviously my
main concern at present is that I’ve passed the final exam!

Daniel Chown, CA student at PKF,
younggun.accountancyage.com

Companies don’t come much bigger, grander or more putatively proper than
Royal Dutch Shell.
So it is profoundly shocking that Shell’s shareholders should have voted against
the substantial remuneration paid to its directors.

Under governance rules, the vote is advisory only: it is non-binding. But it
is a PR disaster for Shell.
It is a warning to every company that shareholders will not tolerate
discretionary pay awards when performance targets are flunked.

Robert Peston, business editor,
BBC,
bbc.co.uk/blogs/thereporters/robertpeston

Related Articles

Sexual harassment – is accountancy next for #MeToo?

Accounting Firms Sexual harassment – is accountancy next for #MeToo?

2d Karen Baxter, Lewis Silkin
Johnston Carmichael CEO appointed as ICAS president

Accounting Firms Johnston Carmichael CEO appointed as ICAS president

3w Emma Smith, Managing Editor
British Accountancy Awards 2018 – entries open!

Accounting Firms British Accountancy Awards 2018 – entries open!

1m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
Is the accountancy sector facing an international talent crisis?

Accounting Firms Is the accountancy sector facing an international talent crisis?

1m Lewis Silkin
RSM appoints new Chief Operating Officer

Accounting Firms RSM appoints new Chief Operating Officer

1m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
RSM announces 11 partner promotions

Accounting Firms RSM announces 11 partner promotions

2m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
BDO hires former AstraZeneca creative director as head of digital and innovation

Accounting Firms BDO hires former AstraZeneca creative director as head of digital and innovation

2m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
What does the future hold for listed accountancy firms?

Accounting Firms What does the future hold for listed accountancy firms?

2m Fergus Payne, Lewis Silkin