I was intrigued to learn that Gordon Brown has announced that all MPs’
receipts for expenses claimed over the last four years will be independently
Presumably, this exercise will also be conducted by the new independent
auditing body, which is to be policed by professional external accountants and
is expected to cost £600,000 per annum.
However, I am not sure if the cost of effectively auditing possibly up to
31,000 expense claims, going back to May 2005 has been taken into account
because the budget seems to only cover future expense claims (which I have a
feeling will be substantially down on past years!).
The big question on my mind is who will get the lucrative contract to audit
these expenses and will they really want it? Let’s face it, any firm of
accountants that zealously goes into expenses in depth could make themselves non
too popular when it comes to awarding lucrative government contracts in the
Can you imagine hauling Gordon Brown or David Cameron over the coals over
their previous expense claims and then suggesting you are the right firm for the
next big contract? So why not award this type of work to accounting firms that
do not carry out any government work? Surely, it is only this type of firm that
can be considered truly independent in carrying out this type of exercise?
While auditing MPs’ expenses will not be as easy as it may seem, The Green
Book published in July 2006 helps by stating that expenses can only be claimed
if they have been incurred wholly, exclusively and necessarily for the purpose
of performing parliamentary duties.
Any accountant worth his salt knows that claiming for horse manure, a bath
plug, a duck pond or even for moat repairs are unlikely to fulfil the ‘wholly,
exclusively and necessarily’ test, particularly when The Green Book goes on to
advise MPs that ‘your additional cost allowance claims are above reproach and
there can be no grounds for a suggestion of misuse of public money’.
So, while I have no doubt that the new independent auditing body will be
staffed by one of the Big Four, isn’t it about time that an exercise of this
type should be given to one of the smaller or medium-sized accountancy firms
that are more than capable of carrying out this assignment?
Lynton R Stock is a partner at
Stock Hutter LLP
Does Darwin's theory apply to taxation? Colin ponders...
Two new audit partners have been appointed at the firm BDO in its audit practice following continued growth and investment
"The whole idea of HMRC officials supplying confidential information about individuals to the media on a non-attributable basis is, or should be, a matter of serious concern," say Supreme Court judges
Investment in people, tech and businesses impacts on EY's profit per partner figure