TaxCorporate TaxBehavioural difficulties

Behavioural difficulties

HMRC is cracking down on tax boutiques, Dave Hartnett explains why they pose such a risk

Our experience with disclosure has shown that, in general, major firms have
introduced a culture of compliance with the regime within their organisations
and staff.

But there are some tax boutiques, at the ‘spivy’ end of the market, that
specialise in promoting the kind of tax avoidance schemes others would not
touch. Indeed, whereas reputable and responsible firms have set their faces
against avoidance schemes involving charities, some boutiques are less
discerning. Their staff may find the risk management systems of reputable firms
too constraining for their taste.

They may be firms of lawyers who will try to market their products on the
back of claims (incorrect) that there is no need to disclose the scheme to HM
Revenue & Customs.

Sometimes their aim is to not only avoid tax but also to avoid the operation
of the disclosure regime rules. We have come across boutiques which do share a
culture of compliance together with instances of inadequate or late disclosures,
disclosures made on the wrong forms or to the wrong office, or even failures to
disclose what appear to be notifiable schemes.

Such failures are not always innocent error with the evidence pointing to a
conscious attempt to delay disclosure purely in order to prolong the life of the
scheme.

In some cases our initial attempts to clarify the situation have been
rebuffed because the boutique’s legal advisers have counselled that disclosure
is unnecessary whilst refusing to provide either the opinion or the associated
instructions.

An additional risk presented by boutiques is the frequently poor technical
quality of the work we see. From time to time our disclosure handling team finds
examples of avoidance schemes which simply do not work because the scheme is
flawed.

That is bad news for the client because he or she may have paid fees for a
product which is not fit for purpose. And the absence of risk and quality
controls mean that clients of some boutiques take on a scale of risk they simply
do not understand.

Finally, your comment section of 11 January suggests that the measures to
reinforce the disclosure regime is an attack on business. It is not. It is
action designed to change the behaviours of a few boutiques and raise the
compliance bar.

Dave Hartnett, director general of HMRC

Related Articles

Big names, little tax: Airbnb, Facebook, Kellogg’s, eBay

Corporate Tax Big names, little tax: Airbnb, Facebook, Kellogg’s, eBay

2m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
New trading allowance: simplicity, but not as we know it

Administration New trading allowance: simplicity, but not as we know it

2m Emma Rawson, ATT Technical Officer
EU divided over radical tax reforms targeting tech giants

Corporate Tax EU divided over radical tax reforms targeting tech giants

3m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
‘Improve rather than lose’ disincorporation relief, tax body urges

Administration ‘Improve rather than lose’ disincorporation relief, tax body urges

3m Austin Clark, Reporter
How to educate your clients about tax avoidance

Corporate Tax How to educate your clients about tax avoidance

3m Clear Books | Sponsored
CGT clampdown nets HMRC £124m – but could lead to increase in use of avoidance schemes

Corporate Tax CGT clampdown nets HMRC £124m – but could lead to increase in use of avoidance schemes

3m Austin Clark, Reporter
‘Google tax’ nets HMRC £281m

Corporate Tax ‘Google tax’ nets HMRC £281m

3m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
Should I incorporate my buy-to-let business?

Corporate Tax Should I incorporate my buy-to-let business?

4m Emma Rawson