TaxCorporate TaxVAT payers will be pleading innocence

VAT payers will be pleading innocence

VAT payers face higher penalties for errors

In the past, if the honest tax payer made an error in excess of £1m VAT, or
an amount which represented 30% or more of the correct tax for the return
period, they were liable to a misdeclaration penalty. The taxpayer was
automatically exculpated in full if they voluntarily disclosed the error to HMRC
or if they had a ‘reasonable excuse’.

The joining of the revenue and VAT arms of HMRC has seen the introduction of
a single set of penalties to cover income tax, PAYE, corporation tax, VAT and NI
contributions. This was included in the finance bill 2007 and will shortly
become law, coming into operation for return periods commencing after 31 March
2008. At the same time, we will see the introduction of the ‘compliance
spectrum’, which grades error according to the behaviour of the taxpayer.

Taxpayers will have to convince an HMRC officer that their error is innocent
to which no penalty should be charged. This puts a lot of power in the hands of
the officer responsible for supervising the taxpayer’s affairs. I will leave you
to decide whether this is a good thing. If this fails, taxpayers can no longer
achieve automatic exculpation by having made a voluntary disclosure. Also the
‘reasonable excuse’ statutory defence disappears altogether. For professional
advisors this means the end of settled case law.

It is expected that not many officers will accept mistakes as innocent
errors. Additionally under the new starting point for negligent penalties is 30%
of the amount of tax due (an increase from the old misdeclaration penalty of
15%), following which the taxpayer can plead that the penalty should be
mitigated down – again not great news for taxpayers.

These changes mean taxpayers who makes a full unprompted disclosure of an
error no longer has an automatic nil liability to a misdeclaration penalty.
Inevitably there will be litigation on issues such as an officer’s decision on
where the taxpayer’s conduct falls under the ‘compliance spectrum’ or the level
of mitigation to be allowed following a disclosure in order to re-establish the
scope of what is reasonable.

The regime captures VAT registered businesses regardless of the size or the
error. While there will be rights of appeal, many will lament the loss of a
system where honest errors were only penalised if significant and full
disclosure or reasonable excuse defences meant even those penalties could be
readily avoided.

David Anderson is an associate in the tax
litigation practice of McGrigors

Related Articles

Big names, little tax: Airbnb, Facebook, Kellogg’s, eBay

Corporate Tax Big names, little tax: Airbnb, Facebook, Kellogg’s, eBay

2m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
New trading allowance: simplicity, but not as we know it

Administration New trading allowance: simplicity, but not as we know it

2m Emma Rawson, ATT Technical Officer
EU divided over radical tax reforms targeting tech giants

Corporate Tax EU divided over radical tax reforms targeting tech giants

2m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
‘Improve rather than lose’ disincorporation relief, tax body urges

Administration ‘Improve rather than lose’ disincorporation relief, tax body urges

2m Austin Clark, Reporter
How to educate your clients about tax avoidance

Corporate Tax How to educate your clients about tax avoidance

2m Clear Books | Sponsored
CGT clampdown nets HMRC £124m – but could lead to increase in use of avoidance schemes

Corporate Tax CGT clampdown nets HMRC £124m – but could lead to increase in use of avoidance schemes

3m Austin Clark, Reporter
‘Google tax’ nets HMRC £281m

Corporate Tax ‘Google tax’ nets HMRC £281m

3m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
Should I incorporate my buy-to-let business?

Corporate Tax Should I incorporate my buy-to-let business?

4m Emma Rawson