TechnologyXBRL: Emperor’s new clothes?

XBRL: Emperor's new clothes?

Is XBRL really all it is cracked up to be?

The US Securities and Exchange Commission should decide in the next few
months whether to make it mandatory for companies to file their financials in
XBRL (extensible business-reporting language) format.

This would be a significant boost to the fortunes of the electronic standard
which has been around for years but never quite got traction.

But while the idea is to create a standard specification for industry-wide
use to help automate and standardise financial reporting, it could be a long
time before this vision is achieved.

Many business users are still struggling to understand how XBRL can help
deliver visual, cross-enterprise insight from raw data using less time and
resources.

To my mind, XBRL isn’t much of an improvement on the standards already in
place and is, in the main, an empty standard.

The original design simply proposed an XML container within which business
reports could be exchanged. In that sense, it is a specialisation of XML.

The main problem is the lack of an inner structure, which has left companies,
governments and standards agencies, such as BASDA, with the task of establishing
their own, often localised standards.

The result is that there is no inherent global compatibility.

Because of the wide-ranging nature of business, these structures, or
‘taxonomies’, are often very complex and frequently leave systems integrators
with a difficult task.

Comparing financial data across companies and borders may be a pipe dream
anyway. It is impossible, for example, to take data on pensions from the UK,
Germany and Italy and compare it, because each company will be subject to
different risk profiles and rules.

Different lenders do things in different ways. XBRL may provide the reporting
infrastructure, but will not provide the level of detail required. For this
reason, and the technical nature of the standard, gaining traction among finance
professionals has been and will remain a huge barrier to adoption.

Interestingly the SEC has recognised the huge level of concern among
companies about having yet more changes in reporting legislation thrust on them.

It has opened itself up and is actively requesting feedback on its
interactive data agenda. Whether or not you’re a fan of XBRL, this sort of
approach is likely to start building momentum behind it. Whether it truly
delivers value to the market will have to be seen, though.

David Turner is group marketing director at CODA, the
finance systems business

Related Articles

HMRC outlines points-based penalty model for MTD

MTD HMRC outlines points-based penalty model for MTD

5d Alia Shoaib, Reporter
GDPR: How legitimate are your legitimate interests?

Regulation GDPR: How legitimate are your legitimate interests?

1w Ian Singer, PKF Littlejohn
Viewpoint: Making Tax Digital is not all doom and gloom

Making Tax Digital Viewpoint: Making Tax Digital is not all doom and gloom

2w Brian Palmer, AAT
Treasury cracks down on Bitcoin amid tax evasion concerns

Regulation Treasury cracks down on Bitcoin amid tax evasion concerns

2w Alia Shoaib, Reporter
AVADO wins award for online ACCA courses

Career AVADO wins award for online ACCA courses

2w Alia Shoaib, Reporter
The role of the accountant as productivity and technology leader

Technology The role of the accountant as productivity and technology leader

3w Receipt Bank | Sponsored
Accountancy in the digital age: Flexibility, agility, efficiency

Accounting Software Accountancy in the digital age: Flexibility, agility, efficiency

3w Pegasus Software | Sponsored
How to get your clients ready for the cloud

Cloud How to get your clients ready for the cloud

4w Sage | Sponsored