TaxPersonal TaxThe beauty of VAT for EC outsiders

The beauty of VAT for EC outsiders

VAT is a beautiful tax. The system of charging VAT on sales and imports, while reclaiming VAT on purchases and zero-rating exports, means the right tax charge always ends up in the right place - the consumer.

Exempt supplies are the only stain on the theory of the tax. The practice is a different matter. Knowing where the tax charge falls and getting the money are not the same thing. E-commerce presents new challenges, and the European Commission’s response is not the complete solution.

The commission published its proposal on 7 June. It will be debated in the council of ministers over the coming months. It is directed at sales of digitised products, such as software and music, downloaded over the Internet by private consumers. At the moment, such a sale from outside the EC is not subject to VAT. A community business does have to charge VAT even if the consumer is outside the community. This gives non-EC businesses an advantage. The position is the opposite to that for goods: imports of goods do suffer VAT, while exports are zero-rated.

The commission’s proposals fit with the theory of VAT. Sales of digitised products to consumers within the community will suffer VAT, but sales to non-community consumers will become zero-rated. The hard bit will be applying these rules.

The biggest problem is that a non-community business will be outside the reach of community tax authorities. When goods are imported, VAT is easy to collect: if the money is not handed over, the goods stay at the docks. But digitised products cannot be held up, and the business does not need to have any assets within the community which the authorities might seize.

Thus when a non-community business is told that it must charge VAT and hand it over, it can simply refuse. If it does not care about reputation it might well do so, in order to keep a competitive advantage. The community’s main hope is that large businesses will want to keep their good record for compliance with local laws, and will voluntarily pay VAT.

Suppose that they do not comply. The commission suggests another weapon.

Businesses selling software and music need to be able to enforce copyright law. If they could not, there would be even more pirating than there is now. The commission hints businesses which do not pay their taxes might not get help.

If this threat could be used, it would be serious. But there are international agreements to enforce copyright. Neither the EC nor member states could break those agreements just to enforce tax law.

Recognising enforcement is going to be difficult, the commission has set out to make voluntary compliance easy. A non-community business will only have to register in one member state, to cover sales to consumers in all 15 states. But this labour-saving measure will not be implemented.

The reason is that it would lead to some member states being more popular than others as places to register. Sweden and Denmark, with their 25% VAT rate, would attract few businesses. Luxembourg, with a 15% rate, would be very popular.

The UK, with a 17.5% rate, the English language and a comparatively sensible regulatory regime, should do well. Member states not attracting businesses would see VAT on sales to their consumers going into other states’ treasuries.

There is no provision for re-allocating the money. Member states losing out will vote against allowing a business to register in just one member state, so this will be rejected. The chance to make compliance simple for non-EC businesses will be lost.

There will be another burden on non-community businesses. They will be asked to charge VAT on sales to community consumers, but not on supplies to community businesses (which will pay the VAT themselves). To do this, they will have to check whether their customers are businesses. The commission expects them to check the VAT numbers which businesses will supply in order to prove their status. They may or may not care enough to bother.

So the commission is thinking along the right lines, but there is a lot of work to do. The EC will have to rely on the goodwill of non-EC businesses.

It had better make life as easy for them as it can.

  • Richard Baron is deputy head of the policy unit at the Institute of Directors.

Related Articles

HMRC appeal rejected in Tottenham Hotspur case

Administration HMRC appeal rejected in Tottenham Hotspur case

2w Emma Smith, Managing Editor
HMRC urged to clarify impact of income allowances on Self-Assessments

Personal Tax HMRC urged to clarify impact of income allowances on Self-Assessments

2m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
New trading allowance: simplicity, but not as we know it

Administration New trading allowance: simplicity, but not as we know it

2m Emma Rawson, ATT Technical Officer
Wealthy individuals could circumvent top tax rate rises

Personal Tax Wealthy individuals could circumvent top tax rate rises

4m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
Italy grants first successful non-dom status application to former UK non-dom

Personal Tax Italy grants first successful non-dom status application to former UK non-dom

4m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
Industry reaction: Taylor Review does not go far enough in addressing tax issues

Legal Industry reaction: Taylor Review does not go far enough in addressing tax issues

5m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
Does the Taylor Review sufficiently address the gig economy?

Corporate Tax Does the Taylor Review sufficiently address the gig economy?

5m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
HMRC tax evasion assistance requests double in five years

Corporate Tax HMRC tax evasion assistance requests double in five years

5m Emma Smith, Managing Editor