TaxPersonal TaxWhy Revenue’s underhand tactics are so wrong

Why Revenue's underhand tactics are so wrong

The news that pension fund trustees are being strong-armed into a settlement with the Inland Revenue before an appeal is heard is disturbing.

The issue – most recently exposed in the ‘Omega’ case – revolves around share buy-back schemes that the Revenue has argued gave the funds an ?abnormal? dividend.

While a final ruling has yet to be made, tax investigators are saying to the trustees: ‘Pay some now or cough up the lot if the decision goes our way’. If the appeal goes against the Revenue, what chances would the funds have of getting their money back?

This is not just a business decision. Trustees are expected to act in the best interests of pensioners. And this might not mean taking a hit and moving on. They are ‘trusted’ with other people’s money.

Unfortunately, and despite their importance, things which affect pension funds do not tend to attract wide public interest, and they are often seen as a soft target by the taxman.

You can guarantee the opposition would be up in arms if it were the pensioners themselves that had to give money back. Pension funds have been acting in good faith – the Revenue itself had said it would not be appealing against earlier decisions, so in the light of the law as it stood at the time, the funds were doing nothing wrong.

Is it right that the Revenue can go back on history? More importantly, are the hardman tactics being used by the Revenue acceptable?

The Revenue is being heavy-handed and underhanded – it should not be allowed to ask trustees to gamble with other people’s money.

Links

Pensioners face £200m tax gamble

Revenue faces defeat in tax fight

Related Articles

LITRG urges government to consider tax changes in disability work plan

Administration LITRG urges government to consider tax changes in disability work plan

1d Lucy Skoulding, Reporter
HMRC appeal rejected in Tottenham Hotspur case

Administration HMRC appeal rejected in Tottenham Hotspur case

2w Emma Smith, Managing Editor
HMRC urged to clarify impact of income allowances on Self-Assessments

Personal Tax HMRC urged to clarify impact of income allowances on Self-Assessments

2m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
New trading allowance: simplicity, but not as we know it

Administration New trading allowance: simplicity, but not as we know it

2m Emma Rawson, ATT Technical Officer
Wealthy individuals could circumvent top tax rate rises

Personal Tax Wealthy individuals could circumvent top tax rate rises

4m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
Italy grants first successful non-dom status application to former UK non-dom

Personal Tax Italy grants first successful non-dom status application to former UK non-dom

4m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
Industry reaction: Taylor Review does not go far enough in addressing tax issues

Legal Industry reaction: Taylor Review does not go far enough in addressing tax issues

5m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
Does the Taylor Review sufficiently address the gig economy?

Corporate Tax Does the Taylor Review sufficiently address the gig economy?

5m Alia Shoaib, Reporter