ICAS’s closed door policy is out of step
So ICAS remains the only institute among the UK professional that refuses to push ahead with public disciplinaries for its members
So ICAS remains the only institute among the UK professional that refuses to push ahead with public disciplinaries for its members
It’s last-man-standing attitude comes about after the ICAEW revealed last
week that it’s own hearing would throw open the doors for public scrutiny.
That the ICAEW made this move should not surprise us. The new disciplinary
body for public interest cases, the Accountancy Investigation and Discipline
Board has written into its founding principles that hearings should take place
in the open and the Public Oversight Board has said that public hearings are
best practice.
That leaves ICAS as the only institute insisting that its members should be
dealt with behind a shroud of secrecy. For that, in practice, is essentially
what will happen if it continues to deal with members in that way.
ICAS argues that open hearings are unlikely to persuade witnesses from
outside the profession to appear, and as there are no powers to compel people to
give evidence, public disciplinaries should remain a closed book. This overlooks
the fact that witness statements can always be taken and submitted to the
tribunals. Plus, none of the other bodies have deemed this a big enough worry to
undermine public hearings.
At a time when many in the profession are attempting to modernise regulation
this is a disappointment. Holding disciplinaries in public has two objectives.
First, the disciplinary body is seen to be doing its job. Second, the member
under suspicion is seen to get a fair hearing.
These principles are, in fact, as old the tradition of jury trials. It seems
a shame that ICAS finds it necessary ignore this precedent.
The numbers you crunch tell a story. Your expertis...
17yEmbracing user-friendly AP systems can turn the tide, streamlining workflows, enhancing compliance, and opening doors to early payment discounts. Read...
View articleOrganisations can enhance their financial operations' efficiency, accuracy, and responsiveness by adopting platforms that offer them self-service cust...
View articleIn a world of instant results and automated workloads, the potential for AP to drive insights and transform results is enormous. But, if you’re still ...
View resourceDiscover how AP dashboards can transform your business by enhancing efficiency and accuracy in tracking key metrics, as revealed by the latest insight...
View articleThe ICAEW cited managing insurance costs, firms struggling to obtain coverage, assessing risk-taking capacity, and evolved firm structures as drivers ...
View articleThe IESBA emphasizes the importance of timely and global adoption of their standards. For corporate accountants, this means staying updated with chang...
View articleKPMG's faces record fine for a widespread exam cheating scandal, implicating senior staff and highlighting systemic ethical issues in the professional...
View articlePwC's Australia tax scandal has led to significant changes, including over 300 job cuts and the refusal to share a crucial report with Australian parl...
View articleAccountants and accounting firms play a crucial role in maintaining financial integrity, facing ethical dilemmas and regulatory challenges. Adherence ...
View articleThe creation of an effective sustainability standards infrastructure requires not only high-quality sustainability reporting and assurance standards, ...
View articleChanges will help to make accounting profession more attractive, ICAEW boss says Read More...
View article38% of firms required significant improvements, prompting the council to state Tier 2 and Tier 3 firms must "prioritise audit quality improvements and...
View article