PracticeAuditWanted: supernanny

Wanted: supernanny

As an expectant father, I have been avidly glued to the latest series of Supernanny. It's a kind of Troubleshooter for parents with unruly kids, but with the Sir John Harvey Jones' role filled by the far more appealing Jo Frost.

While watching the latest bunch of unmanageable brats being transformed into little angels, it struck me that perhaps that perennial debate on nature vs. nurture had finally been resolved. On this, heavily edited evidence, nurture was winning hands down.

In accountancy, there is a similar long-running debate. Most accountants will have been drawn into a ‘rules vs. principles’ discussion at some point, however unwittingly. But this has yet to come to a satisfactory conclusion, even though the need to do so is much more pressing.

The introduction of international standards on auditing has fanned these flames once again. This drive for harmonisation is exposing the fundamental differences in the role assurance plays in the US, compared to here.

To some, especially the more vocal of the investor representatives, these ISAs are too rules-based and may damage the quality of UK audits.

In Blighty, it is commonly accepted that the principles-based approach is far superior to the boilerplate format used in the US. The flexibility it offers gives auditors the room to do their jobs effectively, according to regulators.

So why is the debate continuing? Surely our US counterparts would have taken note by now if the answer was so clear-cut, while the standards’ developers would have had this in mind when creating the new rules. And if these ISAs are so rules-based, why is it investors kicking up a fuss while auditors remain quiet on the subject?

The answer could be liability exposure. The ISAs, argue investors, provide auditors with additional protection against damages claims, even if they could detract from the quality of the audit. It would be unfortunate, given the hard work put in to get proportionate liability by contract, if auditors were to sacrifice their principles for greater protection.

Perhaps Supernanny will be needed to keep accountant-investor relations on a civil footing.

Related Articles

PwC replaces EY as Domino's auditor

Audit PwC replaces EY as Domino's auditor

6d Alia Shoaib, Reporter
The ‘uncomfortable truth’ behind FRC’s Big Four fines recommendations

Audit The ‘uncomfortable truth’ behind FRC’s Big Four fines recommendations

2w Carl Johnson, Stephensons
BDO holds off Big Four to retain top position as AIM auditor

Audit BDO holds off Big Four to retain top position as AIM auditor

2w Alia Shoaib, Reporter
FRC urged to fine Big Four firms penalties over £10m

Audit FRC urged to fine Big Four firms penalties over £10m

4w Alia Shoaib, Reporter
EY to audit Standard Chartered bank

Audit EY to audit Standard Chartered bank

1m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
KPMG replaces PwC as Croda auditor

Accounting Firms KPMG replaces PwC as Croda auditor

2m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
EY fined £1.8m over Tech Data audit

Accounting Standards EY fined £1.8m over Tech Data audit

2m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
Top 50+50: Firms post significant growth in new tax and audit rankings

Audit Top 50+50: Firms post significant growth in new tax and audit rankings

2m Emma Smith, Managing Editor