TaxPersonal TaxFraud: stop the rot

Fraud: stop the rot

Preventing fraud is just as important as dealing with the aftermath

Richard Alderman, new SFO head

There’s a popular misconception that fraud is a victimless crime. At the
Serious Fraud Office the victims of fraud are at the heart of what we do.

In the public consciousness we are primarily associated with prosecuting
high-level multi-million pound cases, often involving the capital markets. True,
these are an important part of our role.

But crimes such as boiler-room frauds and advance fee frauds that directly
impact ordinary people are equally prominent on our radar.

I see the impact of these frauds every working day through the hardship and
anguish that fraud causes. In one SFO case an elderly couple committed suicide
after they lost their pensions as a result of an alleged fraud. Many people like
them spend years building financial security only to have a fraudster take it
away. This incenses me on both a personal and professional level, and
strengthens my determination to ensure these victims get the justice and
compensation they deserve.

We are handling one case at the moment where more than 1,000 people have been
defrauded of a huge amount of money. This is the kind of case where the SFO’s
skills in detection, prosecution and compensation really come to the fore and
where we can help to heal the damage to people’s lives.
With this in mind, we are committed to achieving three things. The first is to
get fraudsters into court as quickly as possible. The second is to secure
adequate compensation for the victims. And the third is to protect people more
effectively from fraud before it happens.

The first two are mainly about simplifying legal processes and ensuring the
right provisions are in place. But the third requires us to do more. The SFO
needs to go beyond a traditional reactive approach and reach out into society to
share our knowledge and experience.

What does this involve? It means getting out into businesses and schools to
educate people about fraud risks and warning-signs.

It means collaborating with law enforcement authorities via the National
Fraud Strategic Authority.

And it also means building closer relationships with intermediaries such as
the accountancy
institutes to align our approaches, mount joint initiatives and communicate more
actively.

With fraud, like disease, prevention is better than cure.

The SFO will always continue to prosecute financial crime. But the best way
to all to work together to prevent it happening in the first place.

Richard Alderman is director of the Serious Fraud
Office

Related Articles

LITRG urges government to consider tax changes in disability work plan

Administration LITRG urges government to consider tax changes in disability work plan

4d Lucy Skoulding, Reporter
HMRC appeal rejected in Tottenham Hotspur case

Administration HMRC appeal rejected in Tottenham Hotspur case

2w Emma Smith, Managing Editor
HMRC urged to clarify impact of income allowances on Self-Assessments

Personal Tax HMRC urged to clarify impact of income allowances on Self-Assessments

2m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
New trading allowance: simplicity, but not as we know it

Administration New trading allowance: simplicity, but not as we know it

2m Emma Rawson, ATT Technical Officer
Wealthy individuals could circumvent top tax rate rises

Personal Tax Wealthy individuals could circumvent top tax rate rises

4m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
Italy grants first successful non-dom status application to former UK non-dom

Personal Tax Italy grants first successful non-dom status application to former UK non-dom

4m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
Industry reaction: Taylor Review does not go far enough in addressing tax issues

Legal Industry reaction: Taylor Review does not go far enough in addressing tax issues

5m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
Does the Taylor Review sufficiently address the gig economy?

Corporate Tax Does the Taylor Review sufficiently address the gig economy?

5m Alia Shoaib, Reporter