TaxPersonal TaxBudget 2000: The devil is always in the detail

Budget 2000: The devil is always in the detail

The chancellor's coverage of issues in his speech was highly selective and the press releases and the Red Book give the fuller picture. Multinational corporations found this to their cost after listening to a Budget speech which gave no clue of the significant changes which were waiting for them in the press releases.

The debate about the chancellor’s proposed changes to double tax relief is set to run and run as the Treasury and taxpayers continue to dispute the estimated yield to the Exchequer of the proposals. Consultation on the proposals ends on 19 April. Multinationals should therefore lobby hard to persuade the Treasury that its estimates are incorrect, and that the proposals are very damaging to the UK as a holding company location. In the meantime, they should plan to take maximum advantage of the old rules during the window of opportunity between now and 1 July 2000. The increase in stamp duty was anticipated but it was expected that the increase would be confined to the top end of the residential housing market. Curiously, the rise in stamp duty is mentioned in the Red Book under measures to promote a fair and efficient tax system, in the context of a restatement of the government’s commitment to address unfairness in the tax system. As the brunt of the stamp duty increase will be borne by business, it seems difficult to understand how this will promote a fair and efficient tax system unless the definition of fair and efficient is ‘more revenue’.

Stamp duty is a substantial source of revenue for the government and is expected to raise £6.6bn in 1999/2000. Perhaps, we should now have a consolidated act for a tax which generates more revenue for the Exchequer than inheritance tax and personal capital gains tax combined.

There are a number of measures to promote simplification in the tax system. Groups of companies have been provided with a practical solution to their need to set capital gains off against capital losses on a group basis. Proposals have also been made to modernise the capital allowances system, to modernise the group relief rules and modernise the complex rules relating to exchange gains and losses, derivatives and loan relationships. These and the other simplification measures are very welcome but they only represent a small step in the direction of a more intelligible tax system.

Any overview of the significant number of proposals in this year’s Budget must be selective and there are many other measures which would be worthy of comment if space permitted. In any event, there is a substantial amount in the Budget for taxpayers and their advisers to get to grips with, and perhaps this is the training they require to prepare themselves for what is expected to be the longest Finance Bill in history.

Related Articles

LITRG urges government to consider tax changes in disability work plan

Administration LITRG urges government to consider tax changes in disability work plan

5d Lucy Skoulding, Reporter
HMRC appeal rejected in Tottenham Hotspur case

Administration HMRC appeal rejected in Tottenham Hotspur case

3w Emma Smith, Managing Editor
HMRC urged to clarify impact of income allowances on Self-Assessments

Personal Tax HMRC urged to clarify impact of income allowances on Self-Assessments

2m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
New trading allowance: simplicity, but not as we know it

Administration New trading allowance: simplicity, but not as we know it

2m Emma Rawson, ATT Technical Officer
Wealthy individuals could circumvent top tax rate rises

Personal Tax Wealthy individuals could circumvent top tax rate rises

4m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
Italy grants first successful non-dom status application to former UK non-dom

Personal Tax Italy grants first successful non-dom status application to former UK non-dom

5m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
Industry reaction: Taylor Review does not go far enough in addressing tax issues

Legal Industry reaction: Taylor Review does not go far enough in addressing tax issues

5m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
Does the Taylor Review sufficiently address the gig economy?

Corporate Tax Does the Taylor Review sufficiently address the gig economy?

5m Alia Shoaib, Reporter