PracticeAccounting FirmsCarbon offsets must be monitored properly

Carbon offsets must be monitored properly

Carbon offsetting won't help if it's not properly monitored

When people talk about climate change and reducing the carbon footprint of
their home or business through offset schemes, one of the most common discussion
points is the validity of these offsets.

Unlike emissions trading, which is regulated by a formal legal framework,
carbon offsets generally refer to voluntary arrangements offered by commercial
and not-for-profit carbon offsets providers. Offsetting involves calculating a
person or entity’s greenhouse gas emissions and then purchasing ‘credits’ from
emission reduction projects.

In their haste to become carbon neutral, many companies have skipped the
crucial first step of adopting reduction strategies. Offsetting may be a cheaper
and quicker alternative to reducing fossil-fuel consumption, but it can
discourage organisations from trying to reduce their own carbon footprints.

Typical examples of offset programmes include tree planting, projects that
encourage renewable energy usage in developing countries and those which may
help lower the carbon intensity of energy supply. Apart from discouraging a
change in corporate behaviour, there are concerns over whether the offset
payments get to the right place.

This doesn’t mean that companies shouldn’t offset. If a business cannot
become carbon neutral without it, it can offset with one of the highly reputable
offsetters available.

The market has suffered from problems of measurement standards. Take some
airlines for example, who for an additional payment will offset the greenhouse
gas emissions of your flight with an equivalent carbon dioxide saving elsewhere.

However, there is no agreed standard for measuring the emissions of a flight,
say from London to New York. Without an agreed measurement methodology, a
company cannot provide assurances around the impact on its carbon footprint.

In autumn 2007 the government will publish the voluntary code of best
practice for the provision of carbon offsetting to UK customers. Organisations
wishing to be accredited under this code will have to use carbon offset credits
from the compliance market only and schemes will be audited annually.

Companies are looking for external assurance over offset schemes for
increased market confidence and credibility of schemes. Without these assurances
the message is buyer beware.

Alan Buckle is CEO Advisory of KPMG Europe

Related Articles

RSM announces growth across every business line in 2017

Accounting Firms RSM announces growth across every business line in 2017

1d Lucy Skoulding, Reporter
WorkStyle: Helping accountants to support new contractors

Accounting Firms WorkStyle: Helping accountants to support new contractors

7d ClearSky Accounting | Sponsored
Grant Thornton grows profits while radically reshaping portfolio

Accounting Firms Grant Thornton grows profits while radically reshaping portfolio

1w Alia Shoaib, Reporter
How to protect LLP firms from a damaging team move

Accounting Firms How to protect LLP firms from a damaging team move

1w Clive Greenwood, Lewis Silkin
Grant Thornton reports gender pay gap at 26.6%

Accounting Firms Grant Thornton reports gender pay gap at 26.6%

3w Alia Shoaib, Reporter
5 ways to adapt your accounting services for millennial clients

Accounting Firms 5 ways to adapt your accounting services for millennial clients

4w Receipt Bank | Sponsored
Smith & Williamson reports double digit growth

Accounting Firms Smith & Williamson reports double digit growth

4w Alia Shoaib, Reporter
RSM UK reports 9% revenue rise

Accounting Firms RSM UK reports 9% revenue rise

4w Alia Shoaib, Reporter