TaxPersonal TaxSelf-assessment system is faulty

Self-assessment system is faulty

Well, how was it for you? Recovered yet or are you still exhausted?

It’s as well 31 January, like Christmas, only comes once a year.

Talking of Christmas, it seems as if the Inland Revenue’s Christmas comes in February when it sends out all those £100 negative gift vouchers. Why is it so many people are being so generous to the taxman by missing the tax return deadline?

Consider the evidence. In each of the first two years of SA, some 650,000 returns were late of the nine million issued. The number late rose in Year 3 to 750-800,000, suggesting that we don’t learn – or, of course, that life gets ever more difficult. With three million returns still outstanding at the beginning of January, it’s a fair bet that, despite sackloads of mail arriving at tax offices, and floods of personal callers taking advantage of the so-called extension of the deadline, a depressing number will be supplementing the chancellor’s already bulging coffers with £100 penalties.

We all know there are some returns so complex they need more time. But what are the reasons for the legions of defaulters?

What proportion are finding it too confusing? (Solution – better guidance?).

Fiscal recidivists? (Solution – targeted enforcement?). Too detailed?

(Solution – a simplified return for those with simple affairs – particularly the elderly?) Burying their head in the sand? (Solution – more targeted education?) Nil tax liability, so nil penalty, so forget it? (Solution – get them weeded out of the system!) Or is the system just too complex?

(Solution – a lesson for parliament, already reeling from the CIOT’s challenge to MPs to fill out their own tax returns).

What is going on? We can guess, but there is no evidence of the reasons.

Can I suggest that if the numbers have risen again the Revenue has a problem? If nearly one in ten of their SA customers can’t manage to comply with its obligations, is the system all it should be?

Incidentally, if this article has a faint sense of deja vu about it, I am repeating a call I made on these pages 12 months ago. Nothing has changed to prevent the flood of defaults happening again.

Surely the authorities must appreciate that a system penalising so many users could fall into a certain amount of disrepute? Let’s please have some work on the reasons. There will be lessons for all in the results.

  • John Whiting is a tax partner at PricewaterhouseCoopers and deputy president of the Chartered Institute of Taxation

Related Articles

HMRC urged to clarify impact of income allowances on Self-Assessments

Personal Tax HMRC urged to clarify impact of income allowances on Self-Assessments

6d Alia Shoaib, Reporter
New trading allowance: simplicity, but not as we know it

Administration New trading allowance: simplicity, but not as we know it

1w Emma Rawson, ATT Technical Officer
Wealthy individuals could circumvent top tax rate rises

Personal Tax Wealthy individuals could circumvent top tax rate rises

2m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
HMRC tax evasion assistance requests double in five years

Corporate Tax HMRC tax evasion assistance requests double in five years

3m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
Rangers tax case to have ‘dramatic’ consequences for football and business

Legal Rangers tax case to have ‘dramatic’ consequences for football and business

4m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
Italy grants first successful non-dom status application to former UK non-dom

Personal Tax Italy grants first successful non-dom status application to former UK non-dom

3m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
Industry reaction: Taylor Review does not go far enough in addressing tax issues

Legal Industry reaction: Taylor Review does not go far enough in addressing tax issues

3m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
Does the Taylor Review sufficiently address the gig economy?

Corporate Tax Does the Taylor Review sufficiently address the gig economy?

3m Alia Shoaib, Reporter