RegulationAccounting StandardsIFRS for SMEs: suitable for micros?

IFRS for SMEs: suitable for micros?

Could the IASB's draft 'IFRS for SMEs' solve the UK GAAP crisis?

Much of the debate about the IASB’s draft ‘IFRS for SMEs’ has been over its
suitability – or unsuitability – for use by ‘micro’ companies around the world.

But could there be a place for the standard in the UK accounting framework,
as part of the solution to the unresolved debate over the future of UK GAAP in
the new international environment?

And, more controversially perhaps, might it in due course provide a
replacement for the UK standard for smaller entities, the FRSSE?

Users of the FRSSE who read through the draft IFRS might note some familiar
features. The IASB has gone a long way towards providing a ‘one stop shop’, a
single standard similar in concept to the UK standard. The proposed
international standard is structured by topic with a separate section on, for
example, property, plant and equipment.

There is a considerable reduction in disclosure requirements, and some
significant measurement simplifications. Overall, the IASB has reduced the
volume of material in its full standards substantially whilst – crucially – not
requiring a mandatory ‘fallback’ to full IFRS for transactions not dealt with in
the SME version.

Many will, however, be unenthusiastic about the prospect of the SME IFRS
replacing the FRSSE, at least without significant changes. Even the ‘typical’ 50
employee company alluded to in the draft standard found application of the
requirements onerous, and may conclude that for the foreseeable future the FRSSE
should be retained as part of a three tier solution to UK GAAP.

However, the ‘IFRS for SMEs’ – perhaps an unhelpful title if the standard is
not suitable for most small companies – might still provide part of the solution
to the ‘UK GAAP question’. It might provide a suitable replacement for GAAP for
unlisted companies ineligible to use the FRSSE, either on a compulsory basis or
perhaps as an option for private companies with an international outlook. The
ASB could still keep the FRSSE simple – indeed, it should take the opportunity
to review its current requirements with a view to turning back the tide of
complexity that threatens to undermine its success.

This debate will rumble on for some time, but those wishing to influence it
should get involved now.

Dr Nigel Sleigh-Johnson is head of financial reporting
at the ICAEW

Related Articles

Demystifying GDPR for accountants

Accounting Standards Demystifying GDPR for accountants

5d Ellen Temperton, Lewis Silkin
EY fined £1.8m over Tech Data audit

Accounting Standards EY fined £1.8m over Tech Data audit

2m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
The great professional services shake-up

Accounting Standards The great professional services shake-up

3m Fergus Payne, Lewis Silkin
What do clients actually want from an accountant?

Accounting Standards What do clients actually want from an accountant?

4m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
Accountants shouldn’t neglect hybrid mismatch anti-avoidance rules

Accounting Standards Accountants shouldn’t neglect hybrid mismatch anti-avoidance rules

4m Alison Conley
Membership of the accountancy profession on the rise

Accounting Standards Membership of the accountancy profession on the rise

5m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
The real price of mates' rates in the provision of professional services

Accounting Standards The real price of mates' rates in the provision of professional services

5m DAC Beachcroft
IASB overhauls insurance accounting with issuance of IFRS 17

Accounting Standards IASB overhauls insurance accounting with issuance of IFRS 17

7m Alia Shoaib, Reporter