TaxPersonal TaxDeregulation New Labour style

Deregulation New Labour style

I notice Tony Blair has promised to tear up vast amounts of red tape that strangles small businesses. Hurrah, or perhaps a muted hurrah as my paper tells me the proposed regulatory reform bill 'will cut more than 20 regulations'.

That does not strike me as particularly vast in the context of the enormous and rapidly growing volume of regulations with which business has to cope.

At the same time I see the health secretary has rushed to endorse the Fabian Society’s recommendation that employers, including small businesses, should be forced to split their PAYE deductions between the part relating to the NHS and the part relating to everything else.

The government has of course already imposed on small businesses the need to cope with student loan deductions, working family tax credit payments and disabled person’s tax credit. It appeared completely disinterested for a long time in relieving the worry amongst many small firms as to whether the national minimum wage legislation applied to directors.

The government has responded to the pleas to align PAYE and national insurance not by recognising that NI is no longer an identifiable insurance fund (it has to be massively supplemented out of general taxation) and merging it with income tax or even by putting NI onto the same cumulative basis that applies to PAYE. Instead its version of alignment is to extend NI to benefits in kind, most of which are of course not within the PAYE net and many of which cannot be readily identified by small businesses at payroll time.

But who cares? A bit of extra red tape for small businesses is clearly nothing to Alan Milburn.

It would be interesting to know how much tax is collected by forcing small businesses to complete forms P11D for most of their staff. I doubt that the cost, not only to business but also to the Inland Revenue, is justified. My secretary has just had her PAYE coding reduced to reflect a #40 ‘benefit’. On checking with our accounts department it transpires this was the cost of the firm’s Christmas tree for last year which she bought and for which we reimbursed the cost.

Although I suspect if I had completed the form, being a pragmatist, I would have broken the law and ignored this, as I am aware that the penalty is tax related so that if no tax is due it is a tissue-paper tiger, I have to accept we were required to show the payment on her P11D.

She has had to spend time checking what it is and so has our accounts department. The Revenue, having altered her PAYE coding has to reamend it. What a lot of work over £8.80 of potential tax. Why is it needed?

Because the P11D does not differentiate between payments that give rise to a benefit, those that might do, and those that clearly do not.

Why should the form require information that clearly cannot give rise to a benefit? I suspect because the government believes small businesses are all liars. But that still does not explain why the only way to combat such supposed dishonesty is to raise tax assessments to get people angry enough to challenge them and then explain the facts to the Revenue so they can reverse their decision.

If Tony Blair really wants to relieve small businesses of red tape he should introduce a short bill excluding such businesses from all regulations and prohibiting new regulations being imposed on them by statutory instrument.

He should then go to parliament with a longer bill re-introducing each regulation he believes it is vital that small businesses should be subject to. Each such regulation should have a clause to itself (preferably with its own regulatory impact assessment) so parliament is aware of how many regulations small businesses are subjected to and what it costs them and the need for each can be debated. If future legislation imposes new burdens on small businesses the need for such regulations should similarly be debated by parliament.

A headline bill that abolishes a few regulations may sound good to Tony Blair but it is little more than a pretence while the government continues to introduce thousands of regulations each year, many of which impose additional burdens on small businesses.

Robert Maas is a partner with Blackstone Franks.

Related Articles

LITRG urges government to consider tax changes in disability work plan

Administration LITRG urges government to consider tax changes in disability work plan

23h Lucy Skoulding, Reporter
HMRC appeal rejected in Tottenham Hotspur case

Administration HMRC appeal rejected in Tottenham Hotspur case

2w Emma Smith, Managing Editor
HMRC urged to clarify impact of income allowances on Self-Assessments

Personal Tax HMRC urged to clarify impact of income allowances on Self-Assessments

2m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
New trading allowance: simplicity, but not as we know it

Administration New trading allowance: simplicity, but not as we know it

2m Emma Rawson, ATT Technical Officer
Wealthy individuals could circumvent top tax rate rises

Personal Tax Wealthy individuals could circumvent top tax rate rises

4m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
Italy grants first successful non-dom status application to former UK non-dom

Personal Tax Italy grants first successful non-dom status application to former UK non-dom

4m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
Industry reaction: Taylor Review does not go far enough in addressing tax issues

Legal Industry reaction: Taylor Review does not go far enough in addressing tax issues

5m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
Does the Taylor Review sufficiently address the gig economy?

Corporate Tax Does the Taylor Review sufficiently address the gig economy?

5m Alia Shoaib, Reporter