In a speech to politicians, businessmen and accountants (including some of the most senior partners in the European arms of the Big Four) Pitt hinted at a number of important concessions.
Firstly he pledged to consider the impact of the Act on foreign investors.
And he said the SEC would ‘seek a better understanding of any conflicts that may exist’ with a foreign company’s domestic regulatory requirements.
But as for actual exemptions, no public offers were made.
Of course this verbal soothing was not driven solely by altruistic motives.
SEC chairmen rarely cross the Atlantic on goodwill missions – especially ones as embattled as Pitt currently finds himself.
What Pitt was there for was to urge foreign companies seeking a US listing not to be dissuaded by the obligations of Sarbanes-Oxley.
The statistics speak for themselves. In 1981 173 foreign companies were registered with the SEC. By 1991 that figure was 439, and by 2001 it was more than 1,300. The SEC wants to see that growth continue.
So, yes, Pitt’s European visit – it would have been a tour had he not cancelled London – was about winning over sceptics about the implications of Sarbanes-Oxley.
But it was also an international roadshow of the kind favoured by the larger investment banks. Pitt was here to sell the US as a future investment vehicle.
Does Darwin's theory apply to taxation? Colin ponders...
The EC has been instructed to draft a European Union (EU) directive authorising an EU financial transaction tax, which would apply to ten of the EU’s 28 member states
Accountancy watchdog the FRC has dropped its investigation into the former chief financial officer of Tesco, nearly two years after the supermarket was engulfed in an accounting scandal
Colin imagines how Apple's logo might change in the wake of the EC's ruling over its Irish tax arrangements