PracticeAuditTrinity tying us up with red tape.

Trinity tying us up with red tape.

When ICAS made known its feelings on the subject of raising the audit exemption threshold last month, it essentially created a trinity of opposition to the government's plans to cut the red tape burden for small companies.

The Scottish institute’s conclusion that the plan to raise the threshold from £1m to £5.6m was not in the public interest, and could damage the quality of accounting in the country, had already been voiced by ACCA, with former president Jonathan Beckerlegge claiming the proposals were ‘hard to comprehend’.

Even the ICAEW, which is normally quite reserved in its pronouncements on government activity, pointed to the ‘possible drawbacks’ of raising the exemption bar.

This level of opposition could prove quite tough for the government if it is truly listening to influential institutions.

Certainly many of the issues raised are genuine concerns – why is the government looking to reduce the number of companies needing audits at the same time as introducing new legislation to improve reporting standards?

But in the end the government may take the words of the three institutes with a pinch of salt.

ACCA, ICAS and the ICAEW are, like all institutes, bodies that exist to represent the interests of their members.

A great number of their members will be heavily involved in audit work.

It doesn’t take a genius to work out that if these proposals are passed then the amount of audit work available to their members will take a significant nose-dive.

With an estimated 66,000 extra companies no longer requiring the services of an auditor it could even, potentially, lead to a reduction in the number of members for the institutes and consequently their finances.

Now, while this may not have influenced the institutes when they made their statements on these proposals, it’s unlikely to have slipped the government’s attention when receiving comments.

It won’t look good for the institutes if they alone are opposed to the rise of the audit threshold, and only if their words are backed by similar concerns from other bodies with less to lose will they once again start to take on any significance.

Related Articles

Is predictive analytics the end of the annual audit?

Audit Is predictive analytics the end of the annual audit?

2d Martin Herron, MHA MacIntyre Hudson
Auditors ‘in the dock’ over Carillion as report calls for Big Four break-up

Audit Auditors ‘in the dock’ over Carillion as report calls for Big Four break-up

7d Emma Smith, Managing Editor
PCAOB sanctions former Deloitte Turkey CEOs over altered documents

Audit PCAOB sanctions former Deloitte Turkey CEOs over altered documents

2w Alia Shoaib, Reporter
KPMG South Africa to review past audit work amid fresh scandal

Audit KPMG South Africa to review past audit work amid fresh scandal

1m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
FRC introduces £10m sanctions for Big Four firms

Audit FRC introduces £10m sanctions for Big Four firms

1m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
Ukraine’s PrivatBank files $3bn claim against PwC

Audit Ukraine’s PrivatBank files $3bn claim against PwC

2m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
Grant Thornton to exit FTSE 350 audit market, citing Big Four dominance

Audit Grant Thornton to exit FTSE 350 audit market, citing Big Four dominance

2m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
Big Four dominate FTSE 250 audit market in Q1 rankings

Audit Big Four dominate FTSE 250 audit market in Q1 rankings

3m Alia Shoaib, Reporter