Climb out of the playpen
Perhaps I’m asking too much, but I always like to have some sort of positive idea of what a Budget is about
Perhaps I’m asking too much, but I always like to have some sort of positive idea of what a Budget is about
Last week’s ‘swansong’ Budget, as someone called it, seemed to have no
guiding principle other than cynical political tinkering.
Corporate tax went down, except it didn’t really because the allowances
changed. That might stop accounting firms from putting out press releases saying
the UK’s tax rate is higher than other comparable countries, but it won’t mean
people move here for tax reasons. The decisions on tax competitiveness have
(rightly, I happen to think) been ducked.
There were a host of other changes, but little, apart from the Manninen
moves, on the complex international tax issues that caused a fuss at pre-Budget
report time.
But the personal tax changes were most perplexing, and actually quite
depressing.
Gordon dropped the basic tax rate by 2p, probably good for most Accountancy
Age readers. And he paid for it by getting rid of the 10% band, something that
most of you won’t especially worry about, either. Since its major impact is to
hit people earning less than £17,000.
But it’s something that Gordon should worry about. Or rather, it’s something
that he claims to worry about.
The chancellor is the kind of politician who says that politics is about
ideas, about changing the world for the better, and not about personalities or
childish politicking. But his Budget is exactly what that is about. It is a
regressive budget from the most moralistically progressive politician we have.
The Tories copped some flak for their response to the Budget. But the
suggestion that this was not a tax cut but a tax con is spot on. More than that,
it was cynical and hypocritical. Can’t we expect more from politicians?
Alex Hawkes is news editor on Accountancy Age