TaxPersonal TaxIntroducing the new mini-GAAR

Introducing the new mini-GAAR

The Tax Faculty, along with many other representative bodies, strongly opposed the proposed introduction in 1998 of a general anti-avoidance provision (GAAR) for corporation tax.

We considered it too wide-ranging in its ambit and unworkable from a practical perspective.

As a result of a barrage of criticism, the proposal was ‘shelved’ by the government last year. Customs & Excise also proposed a series of mini-GAARs to combat avoidance of VAT, but these too have been shelved.

Are GAARs now dead? It looks unlikely. One minister ominously described the general GAAR as ‘parked with the engine running’. Meanwhile, the Revenue appears to have a new strategy: the stealthy introduction of mini-GAARs. Tucked away in the proposed ?tonnage tax? is a mini-GAAR designed to prevent abuse of the new regime.

Tonnage tax is a new incentive for taxing shipping profits. Instead of charging corporation tax on the shipping profits and gains, shipping companies can elect to be taxed by reference to ship tonnage.

So far, so good. However, the company must not be a party to any transaction or arrangement that is an abuse of the tonnage tax regime. An abuse can include a tax advantage being obtained for another company, or a tonnage tax company in respect of its non-tonnage tax activities, or where the tonnage tax profits are artificially reduced.

The provision is both wide-ranging and extremely vague in its application. If a company falls foul of this provision then, in addition to a number of tax consequences, companies are not allowed to re-enter the tonnage tax for a period of ten years – a highly unusual and draconian penalty.

This new mini-GAAR shows that the debate over the introduction of a GAAR is far from over. No doubt we will see the Revenue slipping in similar clauses in other legislation, paving the way for a reintroduced GAAR in due course. To misquote Churchill, this is not the end of the battle over the GAAR but it is, perhaps, the end of the beginning.

  • Frank Haskew is a technical manager at the English ICA Tax Faculty

Related Articles

LITRG urges government to consider tax changes in disability work plan

Administration LITRG urges government to consider tax changes in disability work plan

17h Lucy Skoulding, Reporter
HMRC appeal rejected in Tottenham Hotspur case

Administration HMRC appeal rejected in Tottenham Hotspur case

2w Emma Smith, Managing Editor
HMRC urged to clarify impact of income allowances on Self-Assessments

Personal Tax HMRC urged to clarify impact of income allowances on Self-Assessments

2m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
New trading allowance: simplicity, but not as we know it

Administration New trading allowance: simplicity, but not as we know it

2m Emma Rawson, ATT Technical Officer
Wealthy individuals could circumvent top tax rate rises

Personal Tax Wealthy individuals could circumvent top tax rate rises

4m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
Italy grants first successful non-dom status application to former UK non-dom

Personal Tax Italy grants first successful non-dom status application to former UK non-dom

4m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
Industry reaction: Taylor Review does not go far enough in addressing tax issues

Legal Industry reaction: Taylor Review does not go far enough in addressing tax issues

5m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
Does the Taylor Review sufficiently address the gig economy?

Corporate Tax Does the Taylor Review sufficiently address the gig economy?

5m Alia Shoaib, Reporter