BusinessBusiness RecoveryIs the underlying business viable?

Is the underlying business viable?

As the economy faces uncertainty, many companies need to restructure. This is nothing new, but the diversity of stakeholders who must participate in any restructuring is new.

Companies increasingly use a wide range of financing instruments in addition to traditional equity and (largely UK clearing bank) debt sources. High yield debt, asset based finance and vendor finance are some of the other sources being used. Engaging these parties in any restructuring is challenging, but add debt traders, vociferous shareholders and credit derivatives and there is a matrix of issues to manage delivery of successful restructuring.

Restructuring professionals must understand the position of these stakeholders and ensure they are managed through the process for it to succeed. Many stakeholders are relatively new to restructuring and understandably focus on managing their own risk without engaging in wider issues.

This can be damaging in trying to develop a consensual reorganisation plan and is quite a change from the ‘London approach’ used during the last recession, where the large banks were able to influence most stakeholders.

The workout departments in banks have had to become sophisticated in the way they manage workouts.

A particular complication is determining where risk sits – credit derivatives and credit insurance have sometimes shifted the equity in the reorganisation away from public lenders. A senior banker recently remarked that despite his institution holding a large gross position in a distressed company, it actually held negligible risk. Why should he be as active in managing a restructuring?

Despite the complexity, identifying the underlying exposures and interests of all stakeholders must be conducted fast to keep options open and avoid any single crisis triggering insolvency. For example, we have introduced distressed debt investors to stakeholders to offer them an alternative to sitting through the restructuring.

A fundamental aspect of business recovery advisors is the need to assess whether there is a viable underlying business. A short-term fix can result in this question being overlooked. Ultimately, without a robust core business, any reorganisation is merely a rescheduling of liabilities. Addressing this early can save much pain and ultimately expense to all involved.

Steven Pearson, head of high yield for PwC business recovery services

Related Articles

Carillion collapse: The week so far and industry reaction

Business Recovery Carillion collapse: The week so far and industry reaction

3d Emma Smith, Managing Editor
Kingston Smith & Partners appointed trustees in bankruptcy of ex-Newcastle United footballer

Business Recovery Kingston Smith & Partners appointed trustees in bankruptcy of ex-Newcastle United footballer

3d Emma Smith, Managing Editor
Carillion: PwC appointed as special managers – what happens now?

Business Recovery Carillion: PwC appointed as special managers – what happens now?

5d Emma Smith, Managing Editor
Investment firm acquires Avon Steel Company Limited

Business Recovery Investment firm acquires Avon Steel Company Limited

1m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
Manchester law firm enters into administration

Business Recovery Manchester law firm enters into administration

1m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
KPMG appoints new global head of insolvency

Business Recovery KPMG appoints new global head of insolvency

2m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
EY hired by Carillion to review finances

Accounting Firms EY hired by Carillion to review finances

6m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
Using insolvency as a debt recovery tool

Business Recovery Using insolvency as a debt recovery tool

7m Emma Smith, Managing Editor